How much did SEIBERLICH FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of SEIBERLICH FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,250

Median grant

States reached

$397k

Total assets

Largest grants

FOOD BANK OF DE$5,950
SANDY HOOK PROMISE$4,850
KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE$4,250
CHILD INC$3,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY$2,750
OPERATION WARM$2,700
DELAWARE HUMANE ASSOCIATION$2,500
THE CHALLENGE PROGRAM$2,500
CENTER FOR HUMANE TECHNOLOGY$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,500
WEST END NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$1,500
PAWS$1,500
KIND TO KIDS$1,500
THE GARAGE COMMUNITY AND YOUTH CENTER$1,500
SUNDAY BREAKFAST MISSION$1,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$322k · 49 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$322k

$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%

+157%

Still filing today

37%

14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TC
THE CHALLENGE PROGRAM
8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +47%
OW
OPERATION WARM
9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +216%
SB
SUNDAY BREAKFAST MISSION
8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +24%

Funded once

LL
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHONA SOCIETY
one grant, 2024 · $2k
NL
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE
one grant, 2024 · $1k
A
AAAS
one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Children's Advocacy Center of Delaware

To reduce the devastating long-term effects that child abuse has on children, their families and society through immmediate coordinated, child focused services, education, and advocacy.

Human Services

Delaware Center for Justice

The delaware center for justice, inc. is the leading non-profit organization in delaware committed to transforming the quality of justice through advocacy, policy, and practice.

Crime & Legal

Housing Alliance Delaware

The housing alliance of delaware, inc., formally homeless planning council of delaware, inc. through december 31, 2016, is an independent statewide nonprofit organization that works to strengthen the support system for people who are…

Housing & Shelter

Wayne County Protective Agency Inc

The wcpa is an emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence and their minor children.

Human Services

Network Delaware Inc

Our purpose is to develop change agents.

Human Services

Delaware Helpline Inc

Crisis alleviation information and referral services

Human Services

Delaware Hiv Services Inc

We are dedicated to eliminating the spread of hiv/aids through our leadership to ensure a high quality, seamless continuum of care for all people infected and affected in delaware.

—

Community Dispute Settlement

The organization provides alternative dispute resolution services through delaware and chester counties. the mission is to empower youth, adults, families, businesses, and communities in discovering their own potential to generate…

—

Meals on Wheels Delaware Inc

Meals On Wheels Delaware?s MOWD mission is to raise funds, other resources, and awareness to support meal delivery programs to homebound seniors in Delaware.

Food & Nutrition

Delaware Community Reinvestment Action

Dcrac's mission is to ensure equitable treatment and equal access to credit and capital for all. our commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion is inherent to our mission.

Community Improvement

Springboard Delaware

To build affordable housing communities that foster well-being for all delawareans in need.

Housing & Shelter

Charter School of New Castle

A delaware charter school with a mission that acknowledges the learning differences of each individual child and nurtures the uniqueness of each family structure.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Inc and the most unlike its peers is World Central Kitchen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/20

the rest of the field

12%

7,457/59,795

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

17/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$236,097Human Services$48,200Education$25,750Animals$9,250Arts & Culture$4,000Science & Tech$4,000International$2,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Foundation IncDE30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Delaware · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Chichester Dupont Foundation Inc · Nor' Easter Foundation Inc · Marmot Foundation · Longwood Foundation Inc · Agilent Technologies Foundation · Milton and Hattie Kutz Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SEIBERLICH FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DELAWARE HUMANE ASSOCIATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~1945 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 510082499 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DELAWARE HUMANE ASSOCIATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 1945 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Seiberlich Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Seiberlich Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SEIBERLICH FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Seiberlich Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

SEIBERLICH FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Seiberlich Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph