How much did SECOND SIXTY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 83% of SECOND SIXTY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2022

hopekids

2023

—

2024

policeelizabethtownhope

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k12 grants · $39k
$10k–50k3 grants · $115k
$50k–250k4 grants · $355k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION HARDIN$205,000
ECTC FOUNDATION$50,000
EDGE OUTREACH DBA WATERSTEP$50,000
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES OF KY$50,000
FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAN$45,000
THE PRISONER'S HOPE$35,000
HOSPARUS HEALTH$35,000
ELIZABETHTOWN POLICE FOUNDATION$5,500
AMERICA KIDS BELONG$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
ROOM IN THE INN - ELIZABETHTOWN$5,000
HELPING HAND OF HOPE$4,000
JT'S WAY$3,500
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE 39$2,500
C&P GARAGE INC$2,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$891k · 9 repeat orgs$331k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +219% since the first grant, against +92% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$891k

$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+219%

+92%

Still filing today

33%

68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BH
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION HARDIN
3× · 2022–2024 · $637k · revenue +219%
EF
ECTC FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $150k
TP
THE PRISONER'S HOPE
2× · 2022–2024 · $36k · revenue +539%

Funded once

UC
USA CARESgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +226%
HF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +302%
TC
THE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC
one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Hospice of the Bluegrass Inc

To provide patient-centered medical care to the seriously ill and their families; engage in community partnerships, education and counseling.

Human Services

House of Hope of Kentucky Inc

To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…

Health

Kentucky Social Welfare Foundation

—

Casa of Midwest Kentucky Inc

The mission of the casa program is to provide specially trained and supervised community volunteers to advocate for the abused and neglected children in the hopkins, webster, union, henderson, muhlenberg, and crittenden county's courts,…

Civil Rights

My New Kentucky Home Habitat for Humanity

To eliminate substandard housing in the tri-county area of marion, nelson and washington by building homes for low income families

—

Faith Mountain Mission of Kentucky Inc

Youth Development

Kvc Behavioral Healthcare Kentucky Inc

To enrich and enhance the lives of children and their families by providing medical and behavioral healthcare, social services and education.

Health

Kentucky Foundation for Women Inc

—

Kentucky Humane Society - Animal Rescue

The kentucky humane society is a champion for companion animals, through leadership, education and proactive solutions, we are creating more compassionate communities.

Animals

Kentucky Hemophilia Foundation Inc

To provide eduction and empowerment concerning the treatment of bleeding disorders.

—

Boyle County Habitat for Humanity

To promote clean, affordable housing for needy persons in boyle county, kentucky.

Housing & Shelter

Kentucky Saving Them Together Inc

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Presbyterian Homes and Services and the most unlike its peers is Colorado Gives Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

14/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,010,467Human Services$120,046Housing & Shelter$40,000Crime & Legal$20,500Philanthropy$15,102Health$11,200Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Kentucky CommunityKY26.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Kentucky Community · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · United Way of Central Kentucky Inc · The Community Foundation Of · Schmidt Family Foundation · Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char · Dow Company Foundation · Cralle Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SECOND SIXTY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BUTTERFLY FARMS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 922555659 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BUTTERFLY FARMS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Second Sixty Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Second Sixty Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SECOND SIXTY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Second Sixty Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph

SECOND SIXTY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Second Sixty Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph