Skip to content

· Public charity

Second Life Thrift Store Inc

Thrift store: second life is a nonprofit organization that operates a thrift store (and online store) to support animal welfare.

$287k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$895kHuman Services$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $19,349, the rows itemized in this filing. The $286,945 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $267,596 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$13,342
Median grant
1
States reached
$898k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LifeLine Animal Project$13,342
Furkids$6,007
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MOSTLY MUTTS: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$713k · 21 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
33

Total granted

$713k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+22%

Still filing today

71%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $119k · revenue +141%
  • PP
    PLANNED PETHOOD OF GEORGIA INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $54k · revenue +206%
  • SG
    SPAY GEORGIA INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SA
    SHELTER ANGELS PIT BULL RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • CC
    CATSNIP CARES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +1%
  • FC
    FRIDAS COMPANION ANIMALS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
3
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
4
Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc

Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues dogs and cats from southern state kill shelters and off the streets to save them being euthanized. We also help contract by the pet population by spaying and neutering and educating the public on…

Animals
5
Tennessee River Rescues

we exist to spay and neuter unwanted pets in our local area trying to find them a home to thrive in until the end of their time

Animals
6
Carolina Animal Network

we are a small animal rescue. We help the community by assisting with vet care and rehoming animals they cannot keep. We also pull dogs cats kittens and puppies from local kill shelters when they run out of space, we provide those animals…

Animals
7
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
8
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
9
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
10
Meows and Mutts Rescue

We are an animal rescue who takes dogs and cats from high kill shelters, off the streets and owner surrenders and get them vetted and adopted and we transport them out of high volume areas to the northeast.

Animals
11
Forgotten Tails Animal Rescue Inc

Saving dogs

Animals
12
Peggys Paws

Very small operation, we do T/N/R in the local area

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paws Atlanta Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Second Leash On Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
20/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $118,748 · AnimalsLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INCSpay Neuter Coalition: $67,592 · AnimalsSpay Neuter CoalitionPLANNED PETHOOD OF GEORGIA INC: $53,965 · AnimalsPLANNED PETHOOD OF GEORGIA INCSPAY GEORGIA INC: $48,012 · AnimalsSPAY GEORGIA INCPAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED: $44,496 · AnimalsPAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATEDPET BUDDIES FOOD PANTRY INC: $38,469 · AnimalsPET BUDDIES FOOD PANTRY INCANIMAL DIPLOMACY: $35,532 · AnimalsANIMAL DIPLOMACYLEFTOVER PETS INC: $25,942 · AnimalsLOGANS RUN RESCUE: $25,567 · Animals+22 more: $168,142 · Animals+22 moreGEORGIA STOPPING PET OVERPOPULATION TOGETHER SOCIETY INC: $58,436 · OtherGEORGIA STOPPING PET OVERPOPULATI…Georgia Animal Project Inc: $53,194 · OtherGeorgia Animal Project IncMEOW OR NEVER INC: $25,287 · OtherMEOW OR NEVER INCPAWSITIVE SUPPORTERS INC: $18,462 · OtherPAWSITIVE SUPPORTERS INCNO MORE PUPPIES GA: $15,550 · OtherNO MORE PUPPIES GA+17 more: $97,454 · Other+17 moreMostly Mutts Animal Rescue and Adoption Inc: $5,023 · Human Services
Animals$626,465Other$268,383Human Services$5,023

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $118,748 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSpay Neuter Coalition: $67,592 over 6y, 93% of budgetPLANNED PETHOOD OF GEORGIA INC: $53,965 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetGeorgia Animal Project Inc: $53,194 over 6y, 26% of budgetSPAY GEORGIA INC: $48,012 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetPAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED: $44,496 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetANIMAL DIPLOMACY: $35,532 over 5y, 30% of budgetLEFTOVER PETS INC: $25,942 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetLOGANS RUN RESCUE: $25,567 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetATLANTA ANIMAL RESCUE FRIENDS INC: $17,377 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetFRIENDS TO THE FORLORN PITBULL RESCUE INC: $13,375 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBARKVILLE DOG RESCUE INC: $11,202 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFURKIDS INC: $11,030 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA JACK RUSSELL RESCUE INC: $10,575 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetAHIMSA HOUSE INC: $10,102 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCANINE CARAVAN RESCUE INC: $10,102 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetCATSNIP CARES FOUNDATION: $7,419 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFixing The Boro Inc: $5,950 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPaw Project of Georgia Inc: $5,817 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPurr Nation Cat Alliance Inc: $5,521 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetATHENS ALLIANCE OF ALLBREED CANINE RESCUE INC: $5,027 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETYOF MORGAN COUNTY: $5,025 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGOOD MEWS ANIMAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,025 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDACHSHUND RESCUE EDUCATION AWARENESS AND MENTORINGOF GA INC: $5,025 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMostly Mutts Animal Rescue and Adoption Inc: $5,023 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFLOYD FELINES INC: $5,023 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRESCUECATS INC: $5,021 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetReleashed Rescue Inc: $5,021 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSTREET PAWS INC: $5,021 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetROAD TRIP HOME ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5,021 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSECOND LEASH ON LIFE INC: $5,021 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetATHENSPETS INC: $5,019 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Spay Neuter Coalition ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PETHOOD OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Georgia Animal Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPAY GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PET BUDDIES FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL DIPLOMACY ↗
  • Who funds LEFTOVER PETS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOGANS RUN RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA ANIMAL RESCUE FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS TO THE FORLORN PITBULL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BARKVILLE DOG RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds FURKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA JACK RUSSELL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds AHIMSA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE CARAVAN RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER ANGELS PIT BULL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CATSNIP CARES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Fixing The Boro Inc ↗
  • Who funds Paw Project of Georgia Inc ↗
  • Who funds Purr Nation Cat Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds ATHENS ALLIANCE OF ALLBREED CANINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETYOF MORGAN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GOOD MEWS ANIMAL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Assurant FoundationGA26× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Assurant Foundation · FixGeorgiaPets Inc · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Petco Love · Petsmart Charities Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Banfield Foundation · Pedigree Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · Humane World for Animals Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Second Life Thrift Store Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Second Life Thrift Store Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Second Life Thrift Store’s filings →

    More from the funding graph