Skip to content

· Private foundation

Second Chance Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$529kHousing & Shelter$218kAnimals$100kHuman Services$94kEducation$61kInternational$52kCrime & Legal$42kFood & Nutrition$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$718
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGE HOUSE$69,500
UPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$44,969
SOLUTIONS OF FOLSOM$12,000
LIVE OAK HIGH SCHOOL$8,200
Individual grant recipient$6,879
BOGALUSA HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
VERTICLE CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,600
SALMEN HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
KAIROS PRISON MINISTRIES$2,500
NORTHSORE FOOD BANK$2,500
RICH MAUTI CANCER FUND$2,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$1,500
BLACK AND BLUE FISHING CLUB$1,000
RECREATIONAL FISHERIES RESOURCE INSTITUTE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
PA
CA
UT
MD
TN
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Second Chance Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 73% of the giving stays in LA; by stated purpose, 69%.

Second Chance Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$859k · 16 repeat orgs$370k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
33

Total granted

$859k
$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
0%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +42%
  • NF
    Northshore Food Bank
    3× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +84%
  • TK
    THE KELLY GIBSON FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • ST
    ST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Association On Compulsive Gambling

The company is dedicated to providing assistance through treatment and helpline services to individuals and families who may be affected by problem gambling, substance abuse, or suicide.

Health
2
New Orleans Police and Justice Foundation Inc

Support of the new orleans police department and orleans parish criminal justice system along with crime prevention activities with the public. nopjf helps the nopd initiate innovative programs that make new orleans a safer place to live,…

Crime & Legal
3
Northwest Louisiana Food Bank

Nw la food bank's mission is to be the primary resource for fighting hunger in northwest louisiana.

Food & Nutrition
4
Crimestoppers Inc
Crime & Legal
5
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
6
Southwest Louisiana Law Centerinc

The dual mission of southwest louisiana law center is to provide first rate legal services to the unemployed and economically disadvantaged residents of southwest louisiana and to utilize the organization's legal capabilities for the…

Crime & Legal
7
2222 Tulane Avenue Apartments Nonprofit Inc

As a related entity of unity of greater new orleans, 2222 tulane avenue apartments nonprofit has a mission to reduce, prevent and end homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Food Bank of Central Louisiana

To alleviate hunger in central louisiana

—
9
Greater Baton Rouge Food Bank

Our mission is to feed the hungry in baton rouge and the surrounding parishes by providing food and educational outreach through faith-based and other community partners.

—
10
Acadiana Outreach Center Inc

Acadiana outreach center, inc. provides shelter and support to help the poor and homeless rebuild their lives.

Religion
11
Orleans Sheriff's Office Foundation
Crime & Legal
12
Rebuilding Together New Orleans

Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeast Louisiana Council Boy Scouts of America; the most unlike its peers is St Tammany Outreach for the Prevention of Suicide Inc Stops. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
7/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIDGE HOUSE: $218,000 · OtherBRIDGE HOUSEST THOMAS AQUINAS HIGH SCHOOL: $55,765 · OtherST THOMAS AQUINAS HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOLUTIONS OF FOLSOM: $45,000 · OtherSOLUTIONS OF FOLSOMIndividual grant recipient: $27,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $26,200 · OtherIMMACULATE CHARITIES: $25,000 · OtherLEIGH LECKERMAN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+35 more: $115,972 · Other+35 moreUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $385,888 · HealthUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICESBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION: $69,500 · HealthBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATIONRICH MAUTI CANCER FUND: $22,500 · Health+2 more: $4,700 · HealthST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY: $100,000 · AnimalsST TAMMAN…COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $15,500 · Human ServicesTHE KELLY GIBSON FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $18,000 · Food & NutritionINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS: $10,000 · Crime & LegalLOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $2,500 · Crime & LegalWasatch Immigration Project: $1,500 · Crime & LegalGREATER NEW ORLEANS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 · International
Other$588,537Health$482,588Animals$100,000Human Services$23,500Food & Nutrition$18,000Crime & Legal$14,000Arts & Culture$1,000International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $385,888 over 9y, 32% of budgetST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION: $69,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRICH MAUTI CANCER FUND: $22,500 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetNorthshore Food Bank: $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KELLY GIBSON FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSt Tammany Outreach for the Prevention of Suicide Inc STOPS: $3,700 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSerenity by the Lake Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWasatch Immigration Project: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLIVENGRIN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER NEW ORLEANS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST LOUISIANA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISTROUMA AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds RICH MAUTI CANCER FUND ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗
  • Who funds COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northshore Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds INNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds THE KELLY GIBSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Tammany Outreach for the Prevention of Suicide Inc STOPS ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds Serenity by the Lake Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Shell USA Company Foundation · Northshore Community Foundation · Al & Diane Kramer Foundation Inc · Rocker Family Foundation · Oscar J Tolmas Charitable Trust · Goldring Family Foundation · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Second Chance Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Second Chance Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Second Chance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph