Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Second Chance Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$529kHousing & Shelter$218kAnimals$100kHuman Services$94kEducation$61kInternational$52kCrime & Legal$42kFood & Nutrition$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$718
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGE HOUSE$69,500
UPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$44,969
SOLUTIONS OF FOLSOM$12,000
LIVE OAK HIGH SCHOOL$8,200
Individual grant recipient$6,879
BOGALUSA HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
VERTICLE CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,600
SALMEN HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
NORTHSORE FOOD BANK$2,500
KAIROS PRISON MINISTRIES$2,500
RICH MAUTI CANCER FUND$2,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$1,500
KELLY GIBSON FOUNDATION$1,000
BLACK AND BLUE FISHING CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
PA
CA
UT
MD
TN
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Second Chance Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 73% of the giving stays in LA; read by stated purpose it is 69% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Second Chance Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$859k · 16 repeat orgs$370k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
33

Total granted

$859k
$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +29%
  • NF
    Northshore Food Bank
    3× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue +57%
  • TK
    THE KELLY GIBSON FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • ST
    ST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $26k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Association On Compulsive Gambling

The company is dedicated to providing assistance through treatment and helpline services to individuals and families who may be affected by problem gambling, substance abuse, or suicide.

Health
2
New Orleans Police and Justice Foundation Inc

Support of the new orleans police department and orleans parish criminal justice system along with crime prevention activities with the public. nopjf helps the nopd initiate innovative programs that make new orleans a safer place to live,…

Crime & Legal
3
Northwest Louisiana Food Bank

Nw la food bank's mission is to be the primary resource for fighting hunger in northwest louisiana.

Food & Nutrition
4
Crimestoppers Inc
Crime & Legal
5
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
6
Southwest Louisiana Law Centerinc

The dual mission of southwest louisiana law center is to provide first rate legal services to the unemployed and economically disadvantaged residents of southwest louisiana and to utilize the organization's legal capabilities for the…

Crime & Legal
7
2222 Tulane Avenue Apartments Nonprofit Inc

As a related entity of unity of greater new orleans, 2222 tulane avenue apartments nonprofit has a mission to reduce, prevent and end homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Food Bank of Central Louisiana

To alleviate hunger in central louisiana

9
Greater Baton Rouge Food Bank

Our mission is to feed the hungry in baton rouge and the surrounding parishes by providing food and educational outreach through faith-based and other community partners.

10
Acadiana Outreach Center Inc

Acadiana outreach center, inc. provides shelter and support to help the poor and homeless rebuild their lives.

Religion
11
Orleans Sheriff's Office Foundation
Crime & Legal
12
Rebuilding Together New Orleans

Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeast Louisiana Council Boy Scouts of America and the most unlike its peers is St Tammany Outreach for the Prevention of Suicide Inc Stops. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
6/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRIDGE HOUSE — $218,000 · OtherBRIDGE HOUSEST THOMAS AQUINAS HIGH SCHOOL — $55,765 · OtherST THOMAS AQUINAS HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOLUTIONS OF FOLSOM — $45,000 · OtherSOLUTIONS OF FOLSOMIndividual grant recipient — $27,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $26,200 · OtherIMMACULATE CHARITIES — $25,000 · OtherLEIGH LECKERMAN FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Other+35 more — $115,972 · Other+35 moreUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES — $385,888 · HealthUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICESBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION — $69,500 · HealthBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATIONRICH MAUTI CANCER FUND — $22,500 · Health+2 more — $4,700 · HealthST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY — $100,000 · AnimalsST TAMMAN…COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION — $15,500 · Human ServicesTHE KELLY GIBSON FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $18,000 · Food & NutritionINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS — $10,000 · Crime & LegalLOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS — $2,500 · Crime & LegalWasatch Immigration Project — $1,500 · Crime & LegalGREATER NEW ORLEANS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Arts & CultureMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 · International
Other$588,537Health$482,588Animals$100,000Human Services$23,500Food & Nutrition$18,000Crime & Legal$14,000Arts & Culture$1,000International$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES — $385,888 over 9y, 32% of budgetST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRICH MAUTI CANCER FUND — $22,500 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION — $15,500 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetNorthshore Food Bank — $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KELLY GIBSON FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSt Tammany Outreach for the Prevention of Suicide Inc STOPS — $3,700 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetSerenity by the Lake Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWasatch Immigration Project — $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER NEW ORLEANS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVENGRIN FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST LOUISIANA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISTROUMA AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds ST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds BRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION
  • Who funds RICH MAUTI CANCER FUND
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA
  • Who funds COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Northshore Food Bank
  • Who funds INNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS
  • Who funds THE KELLY GIBSON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds St Tammany Outreach for the Prevention of Suicide Inc STOPS
  • Who funds Serenity by the Lake Inc
  • Who funds LOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Shell USA Company Foundation · Northshore Community Foundation · Al & Diane Kramer Foundation Inc · Rocker Family Foundation · Oscar J Tolmas Charitable Trust · Goldring Family Foundation · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Second Chance Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph