Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Seattle Storm Foundation

Our mission is to offer charitable and educational opportunities to youth in the pacific northwest, as well as support the bipoc community and initiatives through the platform of professional basketball.

$286k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Philanthropy$135kPublic Benefit$100kCivil Rights$78kHealth$76kCommunity Improvement$75kCrime & Legal$35kYouth Development$35kRecreation & Sports$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $272,117 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $286,137 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,020 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $157k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $102k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$236k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER$51,600
COMMON POWER FUTURE$50,000
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$29,000
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY$25,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WA$20,000
TREEHOUSE$15,000
YOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED$15,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE$15,000
TECHBRIDGE GIRLS$15,000
NARAL PRO-CHOICE WA FOUNDATION$13,000
RAVE FOUNDATION$10,000
RAINIER BEACH PTSA$7,900
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,617
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TECHBRIDGE GIRLS: $15k → 10%NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund: $25k → 17%United Negro College Fund Inc: $1k → 14%SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER: $52k → 9%Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund Inc: $30k → 17%Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle: $45k → 9%Lambda Legal Defense and education fund inc: $10k → 17%Seattle Foundation: $55k → 9%URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE: $15k → 9%NARAL PRO-CHOICE WA FOUNDATION: $13k → 9%TREEHOUSE: $15k → 9%YOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED: $15k → 9%GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WA: $20k → 9%WA Therapy Fund Foundation: $11k → 9%Seattle Foundation: $51k → 9%SEATTLE FOUNDATION: $29k → 9%COMMON POWER FUTURE: $50k → 9%RAVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%Common Power: $25k → 9%Uptown Urban Alliance: $15k → 9%Rave Foundation: $10k → 9%Common Power: $25k → 9%The Residency: $5k → 9%RAINIER BEACH PTSA: $8k → 9%Rave Foundation: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$265k · 5 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against -29% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$265k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
-29%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMON POWER FUTURE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +132%
  • UL
    URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE
    2× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +143%
  • LL
    LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $40k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -61%
  • UU
    UPTOWN URBAN ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -77%
  • WT
    WA THERAPY FUND FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
2
Women's Foundation of Minnesota

Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice. WFM applies an Intersectional Equity Framework inclusive of gender, race,…

Philanthropy
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
The Council of Urban Professionals Institute

The council of urban professionals institute's (cupi)mission is to inspire, elevate, and empower the next generation of diverse business, civic leaders and women.

Community Improvement
5
Greater Washington Partnership

We identify shared opportunities and core challenges and offer solutions to the region's most critical issues including skills and talent, regional mobility, infrastructure and inclusive economic growth.

Recreation & Sports
6
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

7
League of Minority Voters

Promote the advancement of minority civic rights through education and empowerment and bringing a voice to the issues that uniquely impact communities of color.

Civil Rights
8
Ms Jd

Ms. JD is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to the success of aspiring and early career women lawyers. Ms. JD is governed by a volunteer Board of Directors comprised of practicing attorneys and community leaders and supported…

Civil Rights
9
Legal Voice

Legal voice was founded on the belief that all women, girls, and lgbtq+ people should be able to live their lives with dignity, safety, and autonomy. we advance justice and build community power by using multiple strategies: litigation,…

Crime & Legal
10
Minnesota Women Lawyers

To advance the success of women attorneys and strive for a just society.

11
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
12
Seattle Children's Guild Association

Seattle children's guild association advocates for seattle children's hospital through volunteer, philanthropic and community endeavors to ensure hope, excellent care and advanced cures for children.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Uptown Urban Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMON POWER FUTURE — $100,000 · Civil RightsCOMMON POWER FUTURELAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC — $40,400 · Civil RightsLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION …NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $25,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND I…Pro-Choice Washington Foundation — $13,000 · Civil RightsPro-Choice Washington FoundationSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $134,859 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATIONURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE — $60,000 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF METR…RAINIER BEACH HIGH SCHOOL PARENT - TEACHER - STUDENT ASSOCIATION — $7,900 · OtherRAINIER BEACH HIGH S…Seattle Children's Foundation — $5,617 · OtherTechbridge Girls — $15,000 · OtherTechbridge GirlsUPTOWN URBAN ALLIANCE — $15,000 · OtherUPTOWN URBAN ALLIANC…THE RESIDENCY — $5,150 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · OtherSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $51,600 · HealthSWEDISH MED…WA THERAPY FUND FOUNDATION — $11,000 · HealthWA THERAPY …GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOU…TREEHOUSE — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentTREEHOUSEYOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG WOM…EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $35,000 · Crime & LegalRave Foundation — $30,000 · Recreation & Sports
Civil Rights$178,400Philanthropy$134,859Other$109,667Health$62,600Youth Development$50,000Crime & Legal$35,000Recreation & Sports$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $134,859 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON POWER FUTURE — $100,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE — $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $51,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC — $40,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRave Foundation — $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPTOWN URBAN ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTechbridge Girls — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN EMPOWERED — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPro-Choice Washington Foundation — $13,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWA THERAPY FUND FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation — $5,617 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESIDENCY — $5,150 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Alaska Airlines Foundation · School's Out Washington · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Seattle Storm Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Seattle Storm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Seattle Storm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph