Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sears Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$201k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Housing & Shelter$267kHuman Services$196kReligion$100kFood & Nutrition$61kInternational$40kHealth$35kPublic Benefit$28kYouth Development$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH ON MORGAN$85,000
THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT$45,000
CASA$25,000
STEPUP MINISTRY$15,000
SHIP COMMUNITY OUTREACH$10,000
GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL$10,000
SAFECHILD$5,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$3,000
WOMEN THAT CARE INC$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHIP COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $10k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $45k → 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $25k → 8%RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 8%RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 8%STEPUP MINISTRY: $15k → 8%STEPUP MINISTRY: $10k → 8%STEPUP MINISTRY: $5k → 8%STEPUP MINISTRY: $5k → 8%STEPUP MINISTRY: $2k → 8%GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $28k → 8%GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $8k → 8%GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$618k · 21 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
16

Total granted

$618k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-6%

Still filing today

52%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthReligionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT
    5× · 2018–2025 · $108k · revenue +91%
  • A PLACE AT THE TABLE
    5× · 2018–2024 · $49k · revenue +126%
  • GO
    GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • B
    BLOOMHERE
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -50%
  • TQ
    THE QUIET PLACE NC INC
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -20%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southlight Healthcare Inc

Southlight healthcare provides access to high-quality mental health and substance use treatment, fostering a resilient community by supporting individuals in their recovery.

Health
2
On the Rise Inc

On the rise's work begins with individuals experiencing homelessness and continues if and when they secure housing. from our origin as a women's organization, our programs have evolved toward inclusion of those historically and…

Human Services
3
The Hope Center Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive life-sustaining and life-rebuilding services that promote healing from substance use disorder, mental health disorders, and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
4
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

5
Community Alternatives Inc

To provide responsive, person-centered services to improve the quality of life of individuals with disabilities.

Employment
6
Safe Harbour Inc

Safe harbour provides a continuum of housing and supportive services for homeless and nearly homeless individuals and families in our communities.

Housing & Shelter
7
Roof Above Inc

Roof above, inc. is an interfaith, not-for-profit organization whose mission is to unite the community to end homelessness, one life at a time. we do so by providing an array of homeless services and housing services in the charlotte metro…

Arts & Culture
8
Durham Home Inc
9
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
10
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
11
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
12
Hope Services Hawaii Inc

Hope services hawaii provides housing-focused interventions to end homelessness through a continuum of services, including homeless prevention and diversion, mobile outreach, medical respite, street medicine, in- shelter medical attention,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Plm Families Together Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Quiet Place Nc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%5%<5yr17%14%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr12%27%35–55yr9%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr17%6%5–10yr20%32%10–20yr14%43%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr9%6%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
965/6,719

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHURCH ON MORGAN — $85,000 · OtherCHURCH ON MORGANBLOOMHERE — $30,000 · OtherBLOOMHERECECILIA RAWLINS FUND — $28,000 · OtherCECILIA RAWLINS FUNDEMMAUS HOUSE — $22,000 · OtherEMMAUS HOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $15,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBWOMEN THAT CARE INC — $14,250 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $13,000 · OtherTHE QUIET PLACE NC INC — $12,500 · Other+17 more — $62,050 · Other+17 moreCASA — $183,500 · Housing & ShelterCASAOAK CITY CARES INC — $21,000 · Housing & ShelterOAK CITY CARES INC+2 more — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $108,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJEC…STEPUP MINISTRY — $36,500 · Human ServicesSTEPUP MINISTRYTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND …THE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC — $6,000 · Human Services+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesGIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $40,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $20,000 · HealthA PLACE AT THE TABLE — $49,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionAspire Inc — $15,000 · EmploymentSAFECHILD — $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$282,300Housing & Shelter$214,500Human Services$162,500Health$60,000Food & Nutrition$54,000Employment$15,000Crime & Legal$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASA — $183,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $108,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetA PLACE AT THE TABLE — $49,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPUP MINISTRY — $36,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOMHERE — $30,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetOAK CITY CARES INC — $21,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAspire Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAFECHILD — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE QUIET PLACE NC INC — $12,500 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTOGETHER WE CAN INC — $8,600 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPLM FAMILIES TOGETHER INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEden Village of Wilmington — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChurches Outreach Network — $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA
  • Who funds THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT
  • Who funds A PLACE AT THE TABLE
  • Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds STEPUP MINISTRY
  • Who funds BLOOMHERE
  • Who funds OAK CITY CARES INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds Aspire Inc
  • Who funds SAFECHILD
  • Who funds THE QUIET PLACE NC INC
  • Who funds THE SHIP OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE CAN INC
  • Who funds PLM FAMILIES TOGETHER INC
  • Who funds THE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds BOYS CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Eden Village of Wilmington
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE
  • Who funds THE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC
  • Who funds Churches Outreach Network

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Carolina Community FoundationNC26.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Bell Schaefer Family Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Bell Cook Family Foundation · A E Finley Foundation Inc · Bell Koonce Burnette Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Realtor Foundation of Wake County

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sears Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sears Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Sears Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph