Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sea Cove Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$718k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$5.4MPhilanthropy$1.6MEnvironment$538kEmployment$425kCivil Rights$125kFood & Nutrition$100kHuman Services$75kYouth Development$20k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+2 grants · $550k
$250,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPLES CHILDREN AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION$300,000
Individual grant recipient$250,000
THE KNOWLEDGE HOUSE$150,000
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$18,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GREEN CITY FORCE: $25k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.6M · 9 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$7.6M
$258k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+1%

Still filing today

78%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyEmploymentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2.5M · revenue +20%
  • NC
    NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +31%
  • TK
    The Knowledge House Fellowship Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $425k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CITY HARVEST INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -3%
  • THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +409%
  • ALL OUR KIN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Workforce Professionals Training Institute

Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.

Employment
2
Futures Ignite Inc

We amplify youth and community power by inspiring, guiding, and advocating for youth to determine their college, career, and leadership futures.

Human Services
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
The Commons Inc

To partner with individuals and organizations to access, organize, and share data that inspires action that restores our environment.

6
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
Techforce Foundation

To champion all students to and through their education and into careers as professional technicians.

Philanthropy
11
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
12
Institute of Food Technologists

As an organization, the institute of food technologists is focusing its work in four main areas, or "roles and goals." each is wide-reaching and helps to advance our mission.steward for the profession and its community - provide learning,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for America Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Conservancy of Southwest Florida. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC — $2,535,000 · EducationACHIEVEMENT FIRST INCTeach for America Inc — $1,550,000 · EducationTeach for America IncMARCY LAB INC — $250,000 · EducationMARCY LAB INC+2 more — $90,000 · EducationIndividual grant recipient — $1,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOU…Individual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…+2 more — $60,000 · OtherNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $1,328,500 · PhilanthropyNAPLES CHILDREN FOU…BROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $125,000 · PhilanthropyBROOKLYN COMMUNITY …The Knowledge House Fellowship Inc — $425,000 · EmploymentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC — $275,500 · EnvironmentURBAN WILD INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $12,500 · EnvironmentCITY HARVEST INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionGREEN CITY FORCE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesGREEN BRONX MACHINE INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 · Youth Development
Education$4,425,000Other$1,560,000Philanthropy$1,453,500Employment$425,000Environment$338,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Human Services$25,000Youth Development$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC — $2,535,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $1,550,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $1,328,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc — $425,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC — $275,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMARCY LAB INC — $250,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN WILD INC — $50,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALL OUR KIN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEdwell Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetGREEN CITY FORCE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREEN BRONX MACHINE INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arbor Brothers Inc Dba Arbor RisingNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arbor Brothers Inc Dba Arbor Rising · Pinkerton Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sea Cove Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • All Our Kin Inc1% of income from government
  • Achievement First Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph