Skip to content
Sdk Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Sdk Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$21kArts & Culture$6kHealth$4kPhilanthropy$4kHuman Services$2kPublic Benefit$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TURNING POINT USA$1,000
CHRISTIAN RESOURCE CENTER$1,000
OUR RESCUE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TROTTER HOUSE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 5 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$26k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+90%

Still filing today

60%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RB
    RIO BRAVO MINISTRIES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $12k · revenue +59%
  • OR
    OUR RESCUE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +21%
  • RL
    REDEEMING LIFE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • PR
    PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • JT
    JAIL TO JOBSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +380%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

Faith Based Pregnancy Services

Health
2
Crisis Pregnancy Center of the Treasure Coast

To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…

Health
3
Cross Timbers Pregnancy Care Center

Cross timbers pregnancy care center is a christian ministry dedicated to preserving the value of human life by providing abortion alternatives, practical assistance, and education to the cross timbers area.

Health
4
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
5
The Sparrows Nest Maternity Home

We are a Christ-centered residential care facility for pregnant women in crisis. We offer a safe home that provides shelter, food, prenatal/postpartum care, spiritual, mental, financial, rides to medical appointments, educational and…

Human Services
6
Redeeming Love Ministries Inc
Health
7
Abortion Alternatives & Womens Center

The tlc community center and abortion alternatives and women's center is a christian ministry program which provides alternatives to abortion; pregnancy related services for women, men and their families; and promotes abstinence as a safe,…

Human Services
8
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
9
Life Choices Medical Center

Christian organization offering a hopeful future by empowering women and men to make life-affirming decisions

Human Services
10
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
11
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
12
Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center dba Hope Pregnancy Resource Center

The mission of hope pregnancy resource center is to reach out in love with life affirming services that empower parents to choose life for their unborn babies. our christ-centered ministry strives to bring about an abortion free community…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Redeeming Life Outreach Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rio Bravo Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RIO BRAVO MINISTRIES: $11,500 · ReligionRIO BRAVO MINISTRIESTAMARS TAPESTRY INC: $3,500 · ReligionTAMARS TAPESTRY INCREDEEMING LIFE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · ReligionREDEEMING LIFE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INCJAIL TO JOBS: $1,000 · ReligionJAIL TO JOBSHILL COUNTRY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $3,000 · OtherHILL COUNTRY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLSOUTH TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $1,500 · OtherSOUTH TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANSPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $1,500 · OtherPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERCHRISTIAN RESOURCE CENTER: $1,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN RESOURCE CENTERTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCSHEPHERDS COLLEGE: $1,000 · OtherSHEPHERDS COLLEGEPregnancy Care Center: $1,000 · OtherPregnancy Care CenterSTRONG FOUNDATION MINISTRIES: $1,000 · OtherSTRONG FOUNDATION MINISTRIESOUR RESCUE: $5,500 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUEAustin Pregnancy Resource Center: $1,000 · Human ServicesHOPE STORY INC: $500 · Health
Religion$18,000Other$11,000Arts & Culture$5,500Human Services$1,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIO BRAVO MINISTRIES: $11,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREDEEMING LIFE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN RESOURCE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJAIL TO JOBS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Pregnancy Resource Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPregnancy Care Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE STORY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sdk Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sdk Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sdk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home