Skip to content
Scott & White Hospital Round Rock at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Scott & White Hospital Round Rock

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

$19M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$19M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$85MArts & Culture$323kHousing & Shelter$147kHuman Services$61kPhilanthropy$50kEducation$30kFood & Nutrition$26kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $19M
$18,675
Median grant
1
States reached
$596M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Scott & White Clinic$19,000,000
Katelle Foundation dba The Kindness Campaign$50,000
United Way for Greater Austin$18,675
Zachary Scott Theatre Center$17,500
Epilepsy Foundation Central & South Texas$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Age of Central Texas: $8k → 10%Family Eldercare Inc: $6k → 10%Family Eldercare Inc: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85M · 14 repeat orgs$313k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$85M
$288k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+48%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    Scott & White Clinic
    9× · 2017–2025 · $84M · revenue +69%
  • ZS
    ZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER
    6× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +8%
  • GA
    GREATER AUSTIN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $155k · revenue +175%

Funded once

  • AC
    AFFORDABLE CENTRAL TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $147k · revenue +3%
  • MK
    MARATHON KIDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +48%
  • Health Alliance for Austin Musiciansgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Chapter of the American College of Cardiology

The purpose of the texas chapter of the american college of cardiology is to contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, to ensure optimal quality of care for individuals with such diseases, and to foster the highest…

—
2
Texans Care for Children Inc

Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…

Crime & Legal
3
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

—
4
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Texas Academy of Family Physicians

The texas academy of family physicians is dedicated to the promotion of a health care environment that values the vital role of family physicians in providing quality, comprehensive care to all texans.

—
6
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
7
Texas Pharmacy Association

The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.

—
8
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
9
Texas Alliance for Patient Access

Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans

Community Improvement
10
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
11
Travis County Medical Society

Travis county medical society (tcms) represents the medical profession in matters of importance to the membership and the community it serves.

—
12
Texas Water Foundation

Texas water foundation is a statewide nonprofit that provides educational resources and educational services on water in texas for decision makers, water professionals, and everyday texans. texas water foundation works in the areas of…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Taylor Educational Enrichment Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Scott & White Clinic: $84,435,270 · HealthScott & White Clinic+7 more: $237,900 · HealthZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $167,500 · Arts & CultureGREATER AUSTIN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $155,000 · Arts & CultureAFFORDABLE CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $146,500 · Housing & ShelterKATELLE FOUNDATION INC: $106,000 · EducationEanes Education Foundation: $9,850 · EducationAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN: $18,675 · PhilanthropyNELSON FAMILY LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · PhilanthropyThe Livestrong Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCASA of Williamson County Texas: $31,170 · Crime & LegalLake Travis Education Foundation: $14,000 · OtherRound Rock Area Serving Center Inc: $10,500 · OtherTaylor Educational Enrichment Foundation: $5,890 · OtherTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $26,628 · OtherCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $26,250 · OtherMARATHON KIDS INC: $25,000 · OtherHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians: $25,000 · OtherFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $11,500 · OtherAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $7,500 · OtherThe Trail Conservancy: $10,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Other
Health$84,673,170Arts & Culture$322,500Housing & Shelter$146,500Education$115,850Philanthropy$59,675Crime & Legal$31,170Other$172,268

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetScott & White Clinic: $84,435,270 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $167,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER AUSTIN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $155,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAFFORDABLE CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $146,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetKATELLE FOUNDATION INC: $106,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $40,900 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCAPITAL AREA COUNSELING: $40,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE: $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA of Williamson County Texas: $31,170 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $26,628 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $26,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARATHON KIDS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN: $18,675 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLake Travis Education Foundation: $14,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY ELDERCARE INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNELSON FAMILY LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRound Rock Area Serving Center Inc: $10,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Livestrong Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Trail Conservancy: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGEORGETOWN SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEanes Education Foundation: $9,850 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION CENTRAL AND SOUTH TEXAS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTaylor Educational Enrichment Foundation: $5,890 over 1y, 6.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foun…St David's FoundationTopfer Family Foundat…The Moody FoundationBetter Business BureauUnited Way for Greate…United Way WorldwideGeorgetown Healthcare…HHL FoundationShield-Ayres Foundati…Carl C Anderson Sr an…The Blackbaud Giving …
Austin Community Foundation IncTX30.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Better Business Bureau · United Way for Greater Austin · United Way Worldwide · Georgetown Healthcare System Inc · HHL Foundation · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scott & White Hospital Round Rock funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scott & White Hospital Round Rock. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scott & White Hospital Round Rock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home