Skip to content
Scott & White Healthcare Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Scott & White Healthcare Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), to encourage broad-based public support of the healthcare system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including patient care, research, and educational and training programs.

$18M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$211MHuman Services$303kPhilanthropy$240kEmployment$212kFood & Nutrition$118kCommunity Improvement$50kReligion$43kHousing & Shelter$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $238k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $439k
  • $250k+7 grants · $17M
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$192M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Scott & White Hospital Round Rock$7,059,646
Baylor Scott & White Memorial Hospital$5,141,417
Baylor Research Institute$1,966,534
Baylor Scott & White Health$1,190,699
Scott & White Clinic$891,181
Scott & White Hospital-Marble Falls$331,585
Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center$310,419
United Way of Central Texas Inc$118,700
Heart of Texas Goodwill Industries Inc$106,200
Unity Partners dba Project Unity$106,200
Scott & White Hospital-College Station$57,686
Hill Country Community Action Association Inc$50,000
Catholic Charities of Central Texas$45,000
Baylor University Medical Center$30,686
Hope Pregnancy Center Inc$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $276k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Highland Lakes Pregnancy Resource Center: $8k → 13%Helping Hands Ministy of Belton Inc: $20k → 14%Unity Partners dba Project Unity: $106k → 22%Texas Healthy at Home: $13k → 11%Helping Hands of Belton Inc: $20k → 14%Economic Opportunities Advancement Corporation: $30k → 16%Unity Partners dba Project Unity: $80k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212M · 24 repeat orgs$401k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
11

Total granted

$212M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+2%

Still filing today

100%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $182k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    Scott & White Memorial Hospital
    9× · 2017–2025 · $115M · revenue +63%
  • HB
    Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +100%
  • SW
    Scott & White Clinic
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • HP
    HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $31k · revenue +6%
  • CN
    Cactus Nazarene Ministry Centergraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +48%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
2
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
3
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
4
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
5
Lake Travis Crisis Ministries

Meet the short-term needs of people in crisis situations by providing immediate help in the form of food & financial assistance. Long-term assistance may also be provided.

Human Services
6
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
7
Feeding America Texas

Feeding America Texas operates exclusively for charitable purposes by supporting food assistance, hunger relief, and community aid initiatives for individuals and families experiencing food insecurity throughout Texas. The organization…

Food & Nutrition
8
Pregnancy Care Center of Southeast Texas

Confidential pregnancy testing; counseling in pregnancy options; classes in prenatal care, parenting and job skills; referrals; providing baby items and clothing.

Health
9
Fredericksburg Community Health Center

The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.

Health
10
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
11
Brenham Pregnancy Center

Brenham Pregnancy Center is a Christ-centered organization serving women and families experiencing pregnancy related issues, from unplanned pregnancy to pregnancy loss. We provide life-affirming consultation, education, spiritual support,…

Health
12
Healthy Family Services of Texas Inc

To provide high-quality, evidence-informed healthcare services to individuals and families, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hill Country Community Action Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Baylor Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
26/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Scott & White Memorial Hospital: $115,449,648 · HealthScott & White Memorial HospitalHillcrest Baptist Medical Center: $21,804,532 · HealthHillcrest Baptist Medical CenterScott & White Clinic: $21,790,493 · HealthScott & White ClinicScott & White Hospital Round Rock: $17,294,533 · HealthScott & White Hospital Round RockBaylor Research Institute: $10,548,564 · HealthBaylor Scott & White Health: $9,034,652 · Health+17 more: $15,421,192 · Health+17 moreUnity Partners: $185,850 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ADVANCEMENT CORP OF PLANNING REGION XI: $30,000 · Human ServicesTexas Healthy at Home: $12,500 · Human Services+1 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $224,900 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of the Brazos Valley: $15,000 · PhilanthropyHEART OF TEXAS GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC: $212,400 · EmploymentCatholic Charities of Central Texas: $45,000 · OtherHope Pregnancy Center Inc: $30,000 · OtherSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $20,000 · OtherDriving Hope of Texas: $10,000 · OtherCactus Nazarene Ministry Center: $30,000 · OtherCHURCHES TOUCHING LIVES FOR CHRIST: $12,500 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC: $42,000 · OtherStay in the Fight Veterans Foundation: $10,000 · OtherSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $20,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $18,000 · Food & NutritionHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · Community Improvement
Health$211,343,614Human Services$275,850Philanthropy$239,900Employment$212,400Other$199,500Food & Nutrition$78,000Community Improvement$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetScott & White Memorial Hospital: $115,449,648 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetHillcrest Baptist Medical Center: $21,804,532 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetScott & White Clinic: $21,790,493 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetScott & White Hospital Round Rock: $17,294,533 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetBaylor Research Institute: $10,548,564 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Health: $9,034,652 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetScott & White Hospital-Marble Falls: $6,692,886 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetScott & White Hospital-College Station: $6,216,921 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetScott & White Hospital Brenham: $1,074,030 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetMID COAST MEDICAL CENTER - CENTRAL: $495,110 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetScott & White Hospital-Taylor: $450,910 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $224,900 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetHEART OF TEXAS GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC: $212,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUnity Partners: $185,850 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBaylor University Medical Center: $154,419 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHillcrest Physician Services: $55,343 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area: $51,676 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSES FOR HEALING INC: $50,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHillcrest Family Health Center: $48,717 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of Central Texas: $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC: $42,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $30,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCactus Nazarene Ministry Center: $30,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ADVANCEMENT CORP OF PLANNING REGION XI: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetScott & White Continuing Care Hospital: $20,971 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUnited Way of the Brazos Valley: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHURCHES TOUCHING LIVES FOR CHRIST: $12,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTexas Healthy at Home: $12,500 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetStay in the Fight Veterans Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBaylor Medical Center at Irving: $7,709 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND LAKES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Central…Garlyn & Lajuan Shelt…Scott & White Memoria…E Rhodes and Leona B …The Frank W & Sue May…BBVA FoundationEdward Jones Foundati…Renaissance Charitabl…The Blackbaud Giving …Raymond James Charita…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…
United Way of Central Texas IncTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Central Texas Inc · Garlyn & Lajuan Shelton Christian Foundation · Scott & White Memorial Hospital · E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation · The Frank W & Sue Mayborn Foundation · BBVA Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scott & White Healthcare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scott & White Healthcare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scott & White Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home