Skip to content
Scott and Kim Negri Family Found at a glance

· Private foundation

Scott and Kim Negri Family Found

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$150kHealth$128kArts & Culture$72kYouth Development$49kPhilanthropy$12kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$405k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
FUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION$15,000
MORSE FOUNDATION$10,000
LOS ANEGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$10,000
NAVAL POST GRADUATE SCHOOL$10,000
HINDS LIFECARE$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$5,000
ALEXANDER THARPE FUND$5,000
HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CA
VA
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$358k · 13 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$358k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+66%

Still filing today

62%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +378%
  • MH
    MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +4%
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $57k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE - SCOTT & KIM
    one grant, 2023 · $24k
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTEREY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • T
    TAPS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
3
The Scga Foundation

The mission of the scga junior golf foundation is to develop an inclusive golf community that enables kids to thrive on and beyond the course. we believe that every kid in southern california, no matter their circumstance, should have the…

Recreation & Sports
4
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.

Health
5
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
6
Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula

Community hospital of the monterey peninsula is dedicated to identifying and meeting the changing healthcare needs of the people of the monterey peninsula and surrounding communities.we are committed to providing high-quality services at a…

Health
7
Marin General Hospital Foundation

To inspire philanthropy for the benefit of marinhealth.

Health
8
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
11
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
12
Saint Agnes Medical Foundation

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical foundation is a member of saint agnes medical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Monterey County; the most unlike its peers is Hg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MONTEREY: $30,150 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MONTEREYFIDELITY CHARITABLE - SCOTT & KIM: $24,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE - SCOTT & KIMCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY: $15,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREYMONTEREY MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $15,000 · OtherMONTEREY MUSEUM OF MODERN ARTTHE WOMENS FUND: $14,000 · OtherTHE WOMENS FUNDCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTEREY: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTEREYLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $10,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK+13 more: $34,943 · Other+13 moreNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $86,833 · EducationNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL …ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL: $12,000 · EducationROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCH…+3 more: $2,800 · EducationMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $74,500 · HealthMONTAGE HEALTH FOUN…+3 more: $2,250 · HealthNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $56,500 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUN…The Morse Foundation: $22,000 · PhilanthropyWIGC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyHG FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $21,050 · Recreation & SportsHOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$153,093Education$101,633Health$76,750Arts & Culture$56,500Philanthropy$27,000Recreation & Sports$21,050Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $86,833 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $74,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $56,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Morse Foundation: $22,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $21,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNational Restaurant Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIGC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN CADDY FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetVETERANS TRANSITION CENTER OF CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CATALINA SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAVIN GLADDING FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFORE BATTEN FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula Fo…Vaquero FoundationNancy Eccles and Home…Pebble Beach Company …The Ayco Charitable F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Bessemer Giving F…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Silicon Valley Commun…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…
Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Vaquero Foundation · Nancy Eccles and Homer M Hayward Family Foundation · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scott and Kim Negri Family Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scott and Kim Negri Family Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scott and Kim Negri Family Found’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home