Skip to content

· Private foundation

Scott and Janet Spoelhof Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$287k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$576kReligion$258kHuman Services$188kYouth Development$127kPhilanthropy$78kFood & Nutrition$35kPublic Benefit$33kInternational$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $162k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$105,000
GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$35,000
POTTERS HOUSE$35,000
COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE$30,000
GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER$16,666
BEER CITY DOG BISCUITS$15,000
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$10,000
THE MARY FREE BED FOUNDATION$10,000
RESTHAVEN$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND ZEELAND$9,000
CALVIN UNIVERSITY$5,000
NOORTHOEK ACADEMY$2,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$2,500
PILLAR CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BENJAMIN'S HOPE: $10k → 8%CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $10k → 8%BENJAMINS HOPE: $5k → 8%CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $5k → 8%RESILIENCE: $3k → 8%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5k → 11%CAMP SUNSHINE: $3k → 10%CAMP SUNSHINE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 24 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$1.4M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
0%

Still filing today

58%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $359k · revenue +85%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $108k · revenue +554%
  • CU
    CALVIN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $91k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • H
    HAND2HANDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +38%
  • WC
    WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +83%
  • FI
    Facilitators International Incorporated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
2
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Westminster Academy

The school provides classical christian education to students in grades junior kindergarten through twelve.

Education
6
David's House Ministries

To provide quality care, facilities and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and program…

Housing & Shelter
7
David's House

To provide quality care, facilities, and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and…

—
8
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
9
Trinity Oaks Christian Academy

Trinity oaks christian academny partners with the christian home and church in the training of children maximizing their potential to lead christian lives according to biblical standards.

Education
10
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

—
11
Heritage Christian School

At heritage christian school, we exist to serve christ by partnering with parents to provide biblically faithful, academically excellent education.

—
12
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Bmw Car Club of America Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY: $358,700 · OtherHOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETYPILLAR CHURCH: $159,000 · OtherPILLAR CHURCHCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $108,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $84,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND ZEELAND: $77,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND ZEELANDBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $68,280 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $40,000 · OtherResthaven: $37,500 · Other+15 more: $103,473 · Other+15 moreCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $91,000 · EducationCALVIN UNIVERSIT…The Potters House: $82,500 · EducationThe Potters Hous…GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $40,000 · EducationGRAND RAPIDS CHR…+2 more: $3,500 · EducationGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $50,000 · ReligionFacilitators International Incorporated: $5,000 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $5,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,260 · ReligionYOUNG LIFE: $58,614 · Youth DevelopmentRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $17,500 · Human ServicesBENJAMIN'S HOPE: $15,000 · Human ServicesWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5,000 · Human ServicesCAMP SUNSHINE: $4,500 · Human ServicesKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionHAND2HAND: $7,500 · Food & NutritionBEER CITY DOG BISCUITS: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,036,953Education$217,000Religion$61,260Youth Development$58,614Human Services$42,000Food & Nutrition$22,500Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY: $358,700 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $108,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $91,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Potters House: $82,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $58,614 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetResthaven: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBENJAMIN'S HOPE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBEER CITY DOG BISCUITS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING HOPE MYANMAR INC: $14,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetVAN ANDEL INSTITUTE: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAND2HAND: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFacilitators International Incorporated: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNOORTHOEK ACADEMY: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMISSION PARTNERS INDIA INC: $1,260 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUrban Alliance Inc: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Potters House ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Resthaven ↗
  • Who funds RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds BENJAMIN'S HOPE ↗
  • Who funds BEER CITY DOG BISCUITS ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING HOPE MYANMAR INC ↗
  • Who funds VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HAND2HAND ↗
  • Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Facilitators International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE ↗
  • Who funds NOORTHOEK ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MISSION PARTNERS INDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Urban Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds BMW CAR CLUB OF AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area IncMI32.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Barnabas Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · John and Judy Spoelhof Foundation · Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Stephen and Valerie Spoelhof Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scott and Janet Spoelhof Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scott and Janet Spoelhof Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Scott and Janet Spoelhof Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Scott and Janet Spoelhof Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scott and Janet Spoelhof’s filings →

    More from the funding graph