Skip to content
Scl Health - Montana at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Scl Health - Montana

We reveal and foster god's healing love by improving the health of the people and communities we serve, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$16M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$102MEducation$3.8MHuman Services$430kCommunity Improvement$187kRecreation & Sports$162kPhilanthropy$51kFood & Nutrition$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $204k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $82k
  • $250k+2 grants · $18M
$17,950
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH SYSTEM INC$16,013,372
ST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$1,774,234
COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER$82,000
HELP CENTER INC$25,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$24,500
MONTANA AMATEUR SPORTS INC DBA BIG SKY STATE GAMES$22,500
EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS$22,500
MONTANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$21,000
BILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$20,500
BILLINGS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$17,950
LEADERSHIP MONTANA INC$10,000
ST JOHN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
THE SCRIPPS HOWARD FOUNDATION$10,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$10,000
LOCKWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT 26$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $800k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELP CENTER INC: $25k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $13k → 14%RIVERSTONE HEALTH: $164k → 9%RIVERSTONE HEALTH: $153k → 9%RIVERSTONE HEALTH: $78k → 9%RIVERSTONE HEALTH: $73k → 9%THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $50k → 9%YMCA: $30k → 9%RIVERSTONE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%RIVERSTONE HEALTH: $28k → 9%COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $25k → 9%YMCA: $13k → 9%YMCA: $11k → 9%YMCA: $10k → 9%BILLINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $8k → 9%BILLINGS FAMILY YMCA INC: $8k → 9%BIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES: $28k → 9%ST JOHN LUTHERAN: $15k → 9%ST JOHN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%ST JOHNS FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%ST JOHN LUTHERAN: $8k → 9%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%ST JOHNS FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105M · 27 repeat orgs$657k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
23

Total granted

$105M
$585k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $86M · revenue +47%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +33%
  • MS
    Montana State University Foundation Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +315%

Funded once

  • BC
    BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $133k · revenue +163%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $90k · revenue +29%
  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Billings Clinic

Billings clinic's mission is quality, compassionate cre for all, with a vision of reimagining health care through connection, service and innovation.

Health
2
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Big Sky Resort Association Inc

Serving as the voice of business, the big sky chamber of commerce champions a healthy economy and works collaboratively with community stakeholders as a conveyor and a catalyst to improve the overall quality of life in the region.

—
4
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
5
Big Sky Care Connect

The purposes of the corporation shall be specifically to operate a statewide coordinated health information exchange and related services to enhance clinical care in the community and to improve and promote public health care in the…

Health
6
Bozeman Area Chamber of Commerce

The bozeman area chamber of commerce, representing its membership, advocates economic vitality, high quality of life and preservation of the competitive enterprise system through leadership, vision and communication.

—
7
Big Sky Youth Education Foundation

Ensuring that christian education can thrive in montana by supporting billings christian school and montana bible college

Philanthropy
8
Montana Business Leadership Council

The mblc exists to encourage and enact business-friendly policies that create good-paying jobs and make montana a better place to live. the primary purpose of the mblc is to educate the public on important business issues, enable citizens…

Community Improvement
9
Benefis Community Hospitals Inc

Benefis community hospitals, inc. (bch) provides medical care and serves as an economic pillar in rural montana communities by supporting the role of critical access hospitals.

Health
10
Montana Contractors Association Inc

Promotion and development of montana's construction industry.

—
11
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Montana

Keeping families with a sick child/children close to the care and resources they need, when it matters the most.

Health
12
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montana Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Scripps Howard Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/55
Grantees still filing
33/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $86,486,594 · HealthSISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH SYSTEM INC+8 more: $721,800 · HealthST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $13,341,490 · OtherST VINCENT HEA…+25 more: $689,709 · OtherMontana State University Foundation Inc: $3,212,100 · EducationWALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY: $148,729 · EducationROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $145,500 · Education+3 more: $90,750 · EducationMONTANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,006,000 · PhilanthropyYWCA OF BILLINGS ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION INC: $106,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $40,915 · PhilanthropyRiverStone Health Foundation: $525,664 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE: $90,000 · Human ServicesBILLINGS FAMILY YMCA INC: $70,500 · Human ServicesBILLINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VIN: $58,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LEADERSHIP & DEVELOPMENT INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSt John's Foundation: $32,500 · Human Services+4 more: $88,000 · Human ServicesMONTANA AMATEUR SPORTS INC DBA BIG SKY STATE GAMES: $127,500 · Recreation & SportsBIG SKY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $67,500 · Community ImprovementNATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATON: $28,773 · Community Improvement
Health$87,208,394Other$14,031,199Education$3,597,079Philanthropy$1,152,915Human Services$914,664Recreation & Sports$127,500Community Improvement$96,273

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $86,486,594 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $13,341,490 over 8y, 23% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc: $3,212,100 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetMONTANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,006,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetRiverStone Health Foundation: $525,664 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetCommunity Crisis Center LLC: $492,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $145,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION: $133,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMONTANA AMATEUR SPORTS INC DBA BIG SKY STATE GAMES: $127,500 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetYWCA OF BILLINGS ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION INC: $106,000 over 3y, 72% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $93,149 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE: $90,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $89,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBILLINGS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $75,450 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetBILLINGS FAMILY YMCA INC: $70,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBIG SKY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $67,500 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetBILLINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VIN: $58,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetBILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $57,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEADERSHIP & DEVELOPMENT INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHORSES SPIRITS HEALING INC: $40,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetSt John's Foundation: $32,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE INC: $31,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetYOUTH DYNAMICS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATON: $28,773 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $28,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP MONTANA INC: $27,750 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetST JAMES HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $26,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBILLINGS SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $26,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetROSE PARK PTA: $25,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetBILLINGS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetHELP CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN MONTANA: $24,800 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSt John's Lutheran Ministries Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMONTANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $21,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHOLY ROSARY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY INC: $15,915 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGALLATIN VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $14,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY: $13,310 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIMROCK FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBILLINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Scripps Howard Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG HORN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAMSEY KELLER MEMORIAL: $9,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CARBON CO: $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Montana Community Fou…First Interstate Banc…Dennis & Phyllis Wash…Charles M Bair Family…Town Pump Charitable …Donald & Carol Robert…Treacy FoundationSample Foundation IncThe Mary Alice Fortin…Otto Bremer TrustGE McDonald FoundationDan & Jeanne Scott Fa…
Montana Community Foundation IncMT60.7× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Montana Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Charles M Bair Family Trust · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Donald & Carol Roberts Foundation in Memory of Virginia K Weston Inc · Treacy Foundation · Sample Foundation Inc · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · GE McDonald Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scl Health - Montana funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scl Health - Montana. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scl Health - Montana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home