Skip to content

Arizona · Private foundation

Sciabica Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$164k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2024
10
Organizations funded FY2023
20%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$30,296
Largest grant, FY2024
$88,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 18
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$2.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 20% of the organizations Sciabica Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 14% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
HealthFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$164k0%
FY202310$160k20%
FY202218$256k56%
FY20219$263kn/a
93% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Membership Benefit$207kAnimals$181kInternational$151kEnvironment$130kPhilanthropy$56kHealth$22kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
CA
VA
AZ
DC
GA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($132k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Sciabica Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTraders4acause: $206,700 over 4y, 17% of budgetAnimal Charity Evaluators: $162,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetThe Life You Can Save: $98,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWorld Resources Institute: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere Inc: $37,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSierra Club Foundation: $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Farm Animal Care: $18,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Good Food Institute Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion in World Farming Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEvidence Action: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Fred Hollows Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetClean Air Task Force Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Sciabica Family Foundation with peer funders

About Sciabica Family Foundation

How much does Sciabica Family Foundation give?
Sciabica Family Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $164,296 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 18 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Sciabica Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Membership Benefit (25%), Animals (21%), International (18%).
Who are Sciabica Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Traders4acause ($207k), Animal Charity Evaluators ($163k), The Life You Can Save ($99k).
Does Sciabica Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Sciabica Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Sciabica Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Network for Good, Paypal Charitable Giving Fund.
Where is Sciabica Family Foundation based?
Sciabica Family Foundation is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sciabica Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph