Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Schwartz Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$551k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$4.7MEducation$2.5MHealth$2.5MYouth Development$1.2MArts & Culture$841kInternational$835kPublic Benefit$373kHousing & Shelter$347kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $479k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$16,700
Median grant
9
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$550,853
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$325,000
CHAI LIFELINE INC$250,000
NOTLEY IMPACT$100,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$50,000
YOUTH INC$48,000
THE KINGS FOUNDATION AMERICA INC$30,000
WARMING PLACE$30,000
ST VINCENT'S SERVICES$25,250
ST VINCENT'S SERVICES$25,000
NANTUCKET BOOK FOUNDATION$25,000
HARLEM RBI INC$25,000
AIDA INTERAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE$25,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION$25,000
DREAM$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $320k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOLDIERS TO SIDELINES: $5k → 10%LEAD THE WAY FUND: $5k → 6%RIVER FUND: $250 → 13%THE KINGS FOUNDATION AMERICA INC: $30k → 14%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 9%COMMUNITY HOPE INC: $10k → 4%LEAD THE WAY FUND: $3k → 6%CARVER CENTER: $3k → 9%GALLOPNYC: $1k → 13%ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $25k → 20%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $10k → 17%ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $25k → 20%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 9%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%CARVER CENTER: $1k → 9%ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $25k → 20%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%DUTCHESS OUTREACH INC: $1k → 9%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 9%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $10k → 20%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 9%CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTERS OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY: $2k → 9%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $5k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $10k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $10k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $10k → 17%HIDDEN WATER INC: $50k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $10k → 17%HIDDEN WATER INC: $3k → 17%HIDDEN WATER: $500 → 17%ASPIRA OF NEW YORK: $13k → 17%ASPIRA OF NEW YORK: $3k → 17%ASPIRA OF NEW YORK INC: $1k → 17%ASPIRA OF NEW YORK INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 89 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

89 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

89
133

Total granted

$12M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $193k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +49%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +51%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $170k · revenue +130%
  • TR
    THE RONALD O PERLMAN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
  • YI
    YOUTH IMPROVING NONPROFITS FOR CHILDREN (YOUTH INC)
    one grant, 2021 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundling and the most unlike its peers is The Albert F Egan Jr & Dorothy H Egan F. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Youth Development CentersDomestic Violence ServicesSchool District FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Addiction Recovery ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Immigrant Worker SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Food Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Military Veterans SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr19%32%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr19%15%20–35yr13%51%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/150
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,610

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

146 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 146 of the 233 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
145/146
Grantees still filing
92/146
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $3,995,546 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATIONNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $500,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+18 more — $429,000 · Philanthropy+18 moreNEW YORK UNIVERSITY LANGONE MEDICAL CTR — $1,102,500 · OtherNEW YORK UNIVERSITY LANGONE MEDICAL CT…YOUTH INC — $420,000 · OtherYOUTH INCHELP USA — $230,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $205,000 · OtherRepresentUs Education Fund — $257,500 · OtherTHE WARMING PLACE INC — $280,000 · OtherTHE WARMING PLACE INCEMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC — $210,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY — $170,000 · Other+109 more — $2,169,874 · Other+109 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,373,322 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYNew York University — $125,000 · EducationNew York Univer…NOTLEY IMPACT — $100,000 · EducationChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $100,000 · Education+17 more — $374,102 · Education+17 moreCHAI LIFELINE INC — $1,105,000 · HealthCHAI LIFE…THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH — $75,000 · HealthTHE FOUND…+6 more — $70,500 · Health+6 moreNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $37,500 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $35,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMON SENSE MEDIA — $25,000 · Arts & CultureCITY LORE INC — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $2,500 · Arts & CultureCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC — $266,700 · InternationalTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN — $160,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $57,000 · International+6 more — $58,500 · InternationalST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC — $85,250 · Human ServicesHIDDEN WATER INC — $53,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $40,250 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE KING'S FOUNDATION AMERICA INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesASPIRA OF NEW YORK INC — $17,250 · Human Services+9 more — $51,500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$4,924,546Other$5,044,874Education$2,072,424Health$1,250,500Arts & Culture$600,000International$542,200Human Services$317,250

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $3,995,546 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,373,322 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $1,105,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WARMING PLACE INC — $280,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC — $266,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund — $257,500 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC — $210,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY — $170,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN — $160,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetNew York University — $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNOTLEY IMPACT — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGalileo Foundation US Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation — $100,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC — $85,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM RBI INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH — $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $70,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $67,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $57,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET BOOK FOUNDATION INC — $55,102 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetHIDDEN WATER INC — $53,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRATHAM USA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHNORTH INC — $44,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $40,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $37,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARLEY FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR A RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL BUDGET — $35,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc — $31,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KING'S FOUNDATION AMERICA INC — $30,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation — $27,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCenter for Humane Technology — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMON SENSE MEDIA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Association of Basketball Coaches Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY LORE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE WARMING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds RepresentUs Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds NOTLEY IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds WORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Galileo Foundation US Inc ↗
  • Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM RBI INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET BOOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN WATER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…The New York Communit…The Hyde and Watson F…The Ayco Charitable F…The Ford FoundationCommunity Foundation …Fairfield County's Co…Gates FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…The Barry S Sternlich…Ainslie FoundationHackett Family Founda…
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY34.8× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Barry S Sternlicht Foundation · Ainslie Foundation · Hackett Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Schwartz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Pacific House Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Community Hope Inc — 41% of income from government
  • Children's Learning Centers of Fairfield County Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Barbaras House Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Greenwich Alliance for Education Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
  • Nantucket Book Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 233 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines