Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schulzman-Neri Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$294kHealth$148kEnvironment$52kEducation$13kYouth Development$8kHousing & Shelter$3kRecreation & Sports$519Civil Rights$500
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$3,820
Median grant
3
States reached
$775
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$18,750
AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC$10,000
PALM SPRING ART MUSEUM$7,526
MUSICAL THEATRE WEST$5,500
MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
THE BASCOM$5,000
GROUND EDUCATION$4,500
INTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE$4,250
LONG BEACH SYMPHONY$4,200
Individual grant recipient$3,820
LITERACY LEARNING CENTER$1,500
LONG BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIO$1,000
LAist$1,000
CVRep$1,000
HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER HAWAII: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$452k · 19 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
20

Total granted

$452k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+31%

Still filing today

68%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF LATIN AMERICAN ART
    3× · 2017–2023 · $44k · revenue +58%
  • MT
    MUSICAL THEATRE WEST
    4× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +21%
  • AO
    AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • HC
    HIGHLAND CASHIERS HOSPITAL FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • AH
    ANC HEALTHCARE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -49%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
3
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
4
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
5
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
6
American Museum of Ceramic Art

Amoca believes clay is magic. it is a simple yet extraordinary material from which artistic masterpieces are created and everyday products are made. from dinnerware to sculpture to cell phone chips and cosmetics, clay is a part of…

Arts & Culture
7
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
8
Museum Associates

To serve the public through the collection, conservation, exhibition and interpretation of significant works of art from a broad range of cultures and historical periods, and through translation of these collections into meaningful…

Arts & Culture
9
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
10
Santa Barbara Museum of Art

To integrate art into the lives of people, fostering imagination, stimulating thought, and creating personally rewarding experiences.

Arts & Culture
11
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
12
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan Counseling Center Hawaii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $91,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSELONG BEACH SYMPHONY: $82,267 · OtherLONG BEACH SYMPHONYHIGHLAND CASHIERS HOSPITAL FOUNDATI: $25,000 · OtherHIGHLAND CASHIERS HOSPITAL FOUNDATI+24 more: $50,454 · Other+24 moreMUSEUM OF LATIN AMERICAN ART: $44,058 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF LATIN AMERICAN ARTMUSICAL THEATRE WEST: $43,700 · Arts & CultureMUSICAL THEATRE WESTThe Bascom Corporation: $42,350 · Arts & CultureThe Bascom CorporationHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $16,971 · Arts & CultureHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ARTPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $13,326 · Arts & CulturePALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUMINTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE: $11,750 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRELONG BEACH MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $11,000 · Arts & CultureLONG BEACH MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION+3 more: $9,500 · Arts & CultureAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $40,053 · AnimalsMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $12,500 · HealthANC HEALTHCARE INC: $10,000 · HealthGROUND EDUCATION: $7,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER HAWAII: $2,500 · Human ServicesCASA YOUTH SHELTER: $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$248,721Arts & Culture$192,655Animals$40,053Health$22,500Education$9,000Human Services$2,500Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSEUM OF LATIN AMERICAN ART: $44,058 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMUSICAL THEATRE WEST: $43,700 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe Bascom Corporation: $42,350 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $40,053 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $16,971 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $13,326 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CITY THEATRE: $11,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLONG BEACH MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetANC HEALTHCARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROUND EDUCATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION: $4,100 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER HAWAII: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCASA YOUTH SHELTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION DBA CHAMPIONS FOR HEALTH: $1,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Foundation at Hearst Castle: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY REPERTORY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONFLUENCE RISING: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Earl B & Loraine H Miller FoundationCA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · California Community Foundation · Long Beach Community Foundation · Bess J Hodges Foundation · Keesal Young & Logan Charitable Foundation · The Rudolph J & Daphne a Munzer Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The RuMBa Foundation of Long Beach · Public Corp for the Arts of the City of Long Beach · The Josephine S Gumbiner Foundation · The Kenneth T and Eileen L Norris Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schulzman-Neri Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schulzman-Neri Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schulzman-Neri Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Schulzman-Neri Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schulzman-Neri’s filings →

    More from the funding graph