Skip to content
Schrillo Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Schrillo Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$94k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$183kHealth$167kEducation$70kHuman Services$56kHousing & Shelter$43kAnimals$32kYouth Development$16kEnvironment$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$15,000
KCET$15,000
THOUSAND OAKS PHILHARMONIC$12,000
LA SIERRA UNIVERSITY$10,000
NEW WEST SYMPHONY$5,650
Individual grant recipient$3,500
HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$3,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION$2,000
VOLUNTEERS OF BURBANK ANIMAL SHELTER$2,000
FRED JORDAN MISSION$2,000
KAUIA ANIMAL EDUCATION FARM$2,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RES HOSPITAL$2,000
ASCPA$2,000
HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOREVER FOUND: $500 → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $2k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $2k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $2k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $2k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $2k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $2k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $2k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%VALLEY FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 14%CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $2k → 14%CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $2k → 14%CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $1k → 14%CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $1k → 14%CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $1k → 14%CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $1k → 14%CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$626k · 54 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
23

Total granted

$626k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+5%

Still filing today

54%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $69k · revenue +2%
  • TO
    THOUSAND OAKS PHILHARMONIC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +65%
  • LG
    LA GOAL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $35k · revenue +261%

Funded once

  • SC
    SDA COMMUNITY SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • UJ
    UCLA JAOSSAN CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Humane Society of Yuma

To reduce the number of homeless pets through adoption, rescue and spay and neuter programs.

Animals
5
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
6
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
7
Actors and Others for Animals

To eliminate pet overpopulation, ensure good care and protection for pet companions, and provide referral and financial support for economically challenged pet guardians.

Animals
8
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.

Animals
9
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
10
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
11
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
12
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Someone Cares Soup Kitchen; the most unlike its peers is Dogs Without Borders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
28/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KCET: $51,500 · OtherKCETLA GOAL: $35,000 · OtherLA GOALST JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER: $30,000 · OtherST JOHN'S HEALTH CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JUDES CHILDRENS RES HOSPITAL: $13,500 · OtherFRED JORDAN MISSIONS: $12,500 · Other+49 more: $167,275 · Other+49 moreTHOUSAND OAKS PHILHARMONIC: $68,000 · Arts & CultureTHOUSAND OAKS PHILHA…NEW WEST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $43,400 · Arts & CultureNEW WEST SYMPHONY AS…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARM…NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $68,875 · PhilanthropyNORTHRIDGE …+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyUNION RESCUE MISSION: $15,500 · Human ServicesUNION RES…Children of the Night: $11,500 · Human ServicesChildren …Valley Family Center: $11,500 · Human ServicesValley Fa…HOPE THE MISSION: $10,500 · Human ServicesHOPE THE …Child and Family Guidance Center: $8,000 · Human ServicesChild and…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesLa Sierra University: $50,000 · EducationLa Sierra…THE ZONTA CLUB OF KAUAI FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationKUMU'S CUPBOARD: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $1,260 · EducationLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $16,500 · Housing & ShelterEastwood Ranch Foundation: $3,000 · AnimalsKAUAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · AnimalsWINE COUNTRY ANIMALS LOVERS INC: $2,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,000 · AnimalsDOGS WITHOUT BORDERS INC: $2,000 · AnimalsNORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP: $500 · Animals
Other$332,275Arts & Culture$123,400Philanthropy$69,125Human Services$57,500Education$55,260Housing & Shelter$16,500Animals$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $68,875 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHOUSAND OAKS PHILHARMONIC: $68,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetLa Sierra University: $50,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW WEST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $43,400 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetLA GOAL: $35,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of the Night: $11,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetValley Family Center: $11,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration: $11,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE THE MISSION: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF THE BURBANK ANIMAL SHELTER: $10,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetChild and Family Guidance Center: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKAUAI FOOD BANK INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Biddy Mason Charitable Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEastwood Ranch Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWAIPA FOUNDATION: $2,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKAUAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASANTE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINE COUNTRY ANIMALS LOVERS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ZONTA CLUB OF KAUAI FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetDOGS WITHOUT BORDERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKUMU'S CUPBOARD: $2,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLA WYLD: $1,500 over 3y, 86% of budgetOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND HALL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREEF GUARDIANS HAWAII: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREVER FOUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THOUSAND OAKS PHILHARMONIC ↗
  • Who funds La Sierra University ↗
  • Who funds NEW WEST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LA GOAL ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Children of the Night ↗
  • Who funds Valley Family Center ↗
  • Who funds Inclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF THE BURBANK ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Child and Family Guidance Center ↗
  • Who funds KAUAI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds The Biddy Mason Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Duffield Family F…Enterprise Holdings F…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodGs Donor Advised Phil…Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…Paypal Charitable Giv…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…
California Community FoundationCA18.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schrillo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schrillo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schrillo Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Schrillo Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schrillo Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home