Skip to content
Schreier Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Schreier Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$67kHealth$39kHousing & Shelter$5kFood & Nutrition$3kReligion$3kCommunity Improvement$2kAnimals$1kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DONORS CHOOSE$13,500
SUSAN G KOMEN$6,000
FIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEADS UP EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%WHISKERS TAILS & FERALS: $1k → 9%SAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%DONORS CHOOSE: $20k → 17%NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN: $500 → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $100 → 15%PARKWAY PARTNERS PROGRAM: $500 → 23%WE ARE SR: $5k → 8%NAPA COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUR TEAM: $1k → 9%DONORS CHOOSE: $5k → 10%DONORS CHOOSE: $14k → 17%SUSAN G KOMEN NEW ORLEANS: $2k → 15%REBUILDING TOGETHER: $5k → 23%DAVIDSON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $500 → 8%QUEEN OF THE VALLEY (HOSPITAL): $100 → 9%DONORS CHOOSE: $3k → 10%DONORS CHOOSE: $7k → 17%FIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI: $2k → 15%TEMPLE SINAI: $1k → 23%WE ARE SR: $500 → 8%SFMARIN FOOD BANK: $1k → 10%DONORS CHOOSE: $6k → 17%FIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI: $2k → 15%TEMPLE SINAI: $1k → 23%ROTACARE CLINIC: $250 → 8%DONORS CHOOSE: $5k → 17%FIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI: $2k → 15%NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN: $1k → 23%DONORS CHOOSE: $5k → 17%SUSAN G KOMEN NEW ORLEANS: $2k → 15%TEMPLE SINAI: $250 → 23%FIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI: $1k → 15%FIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI: $1k → 15%FIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI: $1k → 15%FIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI: $500 → 15%NOLA FOOD BANK (SECOND HARVEST): $1k → 15%NOLA FOOD BANK (SECOND HARVEST): $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$135k · 9 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +225% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$135k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+225%
+10%

Still filing today

44%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    6× · 2019–2025 · $57k · revenue +1%
  • HF
    HOGS FOR THE CAUSE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $12k · revenue +345%
  • FL
    FIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +225%

Funded once

  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • NC
    NAPA COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUR TEAM
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN GREATER NEW ORLEANS SECTION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Herpes Cure Advocacy

Informed advocacy relating to the cure, treatment and prevention for herpes simplex virus types 1 + 2 infections.

Health
6
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
7
New Mexico Perinatal Collaborative

The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…

—
8
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
9
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
10
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
11
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
12
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Whiskers Tails and Ferals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONORSCHOOSEORG: $56,500 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORGFIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI INC: $9,500 · EducationFIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI INCWE ARE SR: $18,500 · OtherWE ARE SRDONORS CHOOSE: $8,000 · OtherDONORS CHOOSESUSAN G KOMEN NEW ORLEANS: $3,560 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN NEW ORLEANSTEMPLE SINAI: $2,500 · OtherTEMPLE SINAINOLA FOOD BANK (SECOND HARVEST): $1,600 · Other+8 more: $4,100 · Other+8 moreThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $23,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen …+2 more: $600 · HealthHOGS FOR THE CAUSE INC: $11,500 · PhilanthropyHOGS FOR THE…REBUILDING TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS: $5,000 · PhilanthropyREBUILDING T…NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN GREATER NEW ORLEANS SECTION INC: $1,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $500 · Community ImprovementWHISKERS TAILS AND FERALS: $1,000 · Animals
Education$66,000Other$38,260Health$23,600Philanthropy$16,500Community Improvement$1,500Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $56,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOGS FOR THE CAUSE INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFIRST LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI INC: $9,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN GREATER NEW ORLEANS SECTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWHISKERS TAILS AND FERALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKWAY PARTNERS PROGRAM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational OCD Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company Fou…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Shell USA Company FoundationTX12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schreier Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schreier Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schreier Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home