Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schorr-Lieberman-Dixon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$149k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$964kEducation$368kHuman Services$105kHealth$91kReligion$60kArts & Culture$12kYouth Development$9kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF)$100,000
THE ARK$10,000
JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE (JAFCO)$10,000
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$8,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT$7,600
LYNN SAGE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS)$2,500
BARBARA SINATRA CHILDREN'S CENTER$1,000
RACE TO ERASE MS$1,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$1,000
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION (BJE)$900
CHILDCARE NETWORK OF EVANSTON$500
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT: $8k → 11%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $12k → 9%ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND (ICRF): $8k → 17%US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $8k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY: $5k → 11%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE (JAFCO): $10k → 13%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT: $5k → 11%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $11k → 9%LIONS OF JUDAH - THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA (JFNA): $5k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY: $5k → 11%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE (JAFCO): $10k → 13%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT: $5k → 11%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $11k → 9%JEWISH ADOPTION FOSTER CARE JAFCO: $10k → 13%LYNN SAGE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT: $5k → 11%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $11k → 9%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE (JAFCO): $10k → 13%LYNN SAGE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATIO: $5k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT: $5k → 11%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE (JAFCO): $10k → 13%LYNN SAGE CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT: $5k → 11%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE (JAFCO): $10k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE (JAFCO): $10k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE (JAFCO): $10k → 13%BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION (BJE): $53k → 14%JEWISH ADOPTION FOSTER CARE JAFCO: $10k → 13%BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION (BJE): $52k → 14%BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION BJE: $52k → 14%BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION (BJE): $52k → 14%BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION BJE: $51k → 14%BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION (BJE): $51k → 14%BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION (BJE): $51k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF): $125k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF): $105k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO: $101k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF): $100k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF): $100k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF): $100k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF): $100k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF): $100k → 14%JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO: $75k → 14%THE ARK: $20k → 14%THE ARK: $10k → 14%THE ARK: $10k → 14%THE ARK: $10k → 14%THE ARK: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
CT
CA
CO
MO
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 18 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against +56% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
19

Total granted

$1.5M
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+56%

Still filing today

44%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $176k · revenue +13%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $44k · revenue +4%
  • LS
    LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • BC
    BEBER CAMP ANNUAL FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kids in Danger. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF): $730,000 · OtherJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METRO CHICAGO (JUF)BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION (BJE): $362,750 · OtherBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION (BJE)JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE (JAFCO): $70,000 · OtherTHE ARK: $60,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $44,800 · Other+24 more: $75,150 · Other+24 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $175,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED…JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERA…+2 more: $1,100 · PhilanthropyBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $43,690 · HealthPCD KS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Health+3 more: $1,700 · HealthLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $27,050 · Housing & ShelterThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $1,000 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Chicago: $1,000 · EducationDogs For Our Brave Inc: $500 · Public Benefit
Other$1,342,700Philanthropy$186,600Health$47,890Housing & Shelter$27,050Arts & Culture$11,000Education$1,000Public Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $175,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $44,800 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $43,690 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $27,050 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPCD KS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildcare Network of Evanston: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKids In Danger: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDogs For Our Brave Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRose Community Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds PCD KS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Childcare Network of Evanston ↗
  • Who funds RACE TO ERASE MS ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Kids In Danger ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CANCER WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Dogs For Our Brave Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schorr-Lieberman-Dixon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schorr-Lieberman-Dixon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schorr-Lieberman-Dixon Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Schorr-Lieberman-Dixon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schorr-Lieberman-Dixon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph