Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
9
Organizations funded FY2023
11%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Ojc Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $32k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’20
7
’21
5
’22
7
’23
4
’24
6
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2023
$3,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$13,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 15
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$93k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 11% of the organizations Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 5% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
PhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20239$32k11%
FY20226$13k17%
FY202112$28k67%
FY202015$27kn/a
87% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$125kPhilanthropy$110kRecreation & Sports$1kHealth$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Global Center of Skver$31,0004n/a
Shekel Hakodesh$18,0006n/a
Congregation Toldos Yakov Yosef$11,2005n/a
Kupath Chasanim$10,0002n/a
Congregation Yeshiva Avir Yakov$8,6006n/a
Kollel Avreichim of Brooklyn$8,0006n/a
Cong Khal Torath Chaim Inc$5,0001n/a
Mfk Charitable Foundation$4,50021%
Congregation Tiferes Bais Zwehil$2,0001n/a
Yeshiva Chug Chasam Sofer Machne Avrohom$2,0001n/a
Show all 18 grantees
All grantees of Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Global Center of Skver$31,0004n/a
Shekel Hakodesh$18,0006n/a
Congregation Toldos Yakov Yosef$11,2005n/a
Kupath Chasanim$10,0002n/a
Congregation Yeshiva Avir Yakov$8,6006n/a
Kollel Avreichim of Brooklyn$8,0006n/a
Cong Khal Torath Chaim Inc$5,0001n/a
Mfk Charitable Foundation$4,50021%
Congregation Tiferes Bais Zwehil$2,0001n/a
Yeshiva Chug Chasam Sofer Machne Avrohom$2,0001n/a
Mosdos Chasidei Square Tyy of Boro Park$1,0001n/a
Share of New Square Inc Dba Chesed 247$1,00010%
Kolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc$1,00010%
Merkaz Hakolilim Dshikyn Square$1,0001n/a
Cong Zvi Lezadik Bluzev$6001n/a
Mosdos Chasidei Square Tyy of Williamsburg$5001n/a
Mifal Mayunes Inc$50010%
Congregation Tiferes Yechezkel$5001n/a

Plus 14 recipients with no EIN on record ($50k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY32.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Lodz Charitable Trust · Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc · Torah & Chesed Fund · Mezritch Foundation · The Eisner Charitable Foundation Inc · The Gds Foundation · Rachels Foundation · Mtw Services Inc · The Pillars Trust · Md Friedman Family Foundation · Ani Mamin Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund with peer funders

About Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund

How much does Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund give?
Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund reported 9 grants totaling $32,300 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 15 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (48%), Philanthropy (42%), Recreation & Sports (0%).
Who are Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Global Center of Skver ($31k), Shekel Hakodesh ($18k), Congregation Toldos Yakov Yosef ($11k).
Does Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 11% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Ojc Fund, Lodz Charitable Trust, Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc.
Where is Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund based?
Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schonfeld Tzodoko’s filings →

More from the funding graph