· Public charity
Mtw Services Inc
We provide referral information, personal services, and emotional support for families with mentally and physically disabled children and adults.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 27 grants below total $1,301,961 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,413,361 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $111,400 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k9 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $268k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $491k
- $250k+1 grant · $480k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Talmud Torah Ohr Moshe | $480,000 |
| Cong Yeshiva Avir Yakov | $240,765 |
| Congregation Zemach David | $150,000 |
| Global Center of Skver | $99,800 |
| Shekel Hakodesh | $49,020 |
| Cong oseh choyil | $40,100 |
| Bonei Olam | $24,720 |
| Cong Kehilas Belz USA | $19,900 |
| Yeshous Yisroel | $18,600 |
| Congregation Bnos Toras Emachu Inc | $17,720 |
| Talmud Torah Tashbar | $16,000 |
| Mikvah Yisroel | $15,400 |
| Cong of New Square | $13,406 |
| Cong Square Mosdos | $12,200 |
| Cong Sdei Yosef Inc | $10,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Gds Foundation · Mezritch Foundation · Cco Services · Lodz Charitable Trust · Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc · Rachels Foundation · Torah & Chesed Fund · The Pillars Trust · Ani Mamin Foundation · The Light of Chaim Foundation · The H y K Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mtw Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.