Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

The Pillars Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$104k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
50
Grants FY2024
46
Organizations funded FY2023
24%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$250
Largest grant, FY2024
$29,100
Organizations funded a year
1 to 124
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$966k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 24% of the organizations The Pillars Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 31% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving50$104k10%
FY202346$168k24%
FY202274$122k19%
FY2021124$180k100%
FY20201$61k0%
FY20191$39k0%
FY20181$74k0%
FY20171$33kn/a
53% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$260kPhilanthropy$209kCommunity Improvement$109kCivil Rights$45kPublic Benefit$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kYouth Development$1kHealth$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Shekel Hakodesh$13,3104n/a
Yad Ltalmid Inc$8,35011%
Congregation of New Square$7,7004n/a
Cong Sdei Yakov Inc$7,2002n/a
Global Center of Skver$3,6001n/a
Cong Ohel Torah$2,2754n/a
Kesser Bais Yakov$1,4453n/a
Keren Hashviis Inc$1,21030%
Lomdei Torah$1,0001n/a
Congregation Zemach David$9324n/a
Show all 42 grantees
All grantees of The Pillars Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Shekel Hakodesh$13,3104n/a
Yad Ltalmid Inc$8,35011%
Congregation of New Square$7,7004n/a
Cong Sdei Yakov Inc$7,2002n/a
Global Center of Skver$3,6001n/a
Cong Ohel Torah$2,2754n/a
Kesser Bais Yakov$1,4453n/a
Keren Hashviis Inc$1,21030%
Lomdei Torah$1,0001n/a
Congregation Zemach David$9324n/a
Mifal Chesed Inc$8021n/a
Yeshiva Dmonsey$7704n/a
Maamar Mordechai Inc$72020%
Bonei Olam Inc$54740%
Cong Bnei Yechiel$3244n/a
Torah & Chesed Fund$32020%
A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange$31340%
Bais Pinchos$2501n/a
Talmud Torah Chayei Olam$1801n/a
Khal Chasidei Belz$1542n/a
Cong Ohr Yisroel Vilednik$721n/a
Tomeich Yisroel Inc$7210%
Refuah Helpline Incdba Refuah Resources$5420%
Kollel Avreichim of Brooklyn$501n/a
Shuvu Return Inc$4320%
Yeshivas Ohr V'Daas$3520%
Misaskim Corp$3020%
Bikur Cholim Inc$3020%
Mifal Mayunes Inc$2510%
Mikvah USA Inc$2510%
Chai Lifeline Inc$2520%
Masbia$2520%
Ohr Bachoshech Inc$251n/a
Viznitz Institutions Inc$201n/a
Zaka$201n/a
CIO of Argentina$151n/a
Arachim America Inc$1510%
Ahavas Zion$121n/a
Agudas Tov V'Chesed Inc$1010%
Lev Leyeled Inc$1010%
Yeshiva Derech Chaim$510%
Chonen Vnosen$51n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 113 recipients with no EIN on record ($730k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Pillars Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYad Ltalmid Inc: $8,350 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKeren Hashviis Inc: $1,210 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMaamar Mordechai Inc: $720 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $547 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTorah & Chesed Fund: $320 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $313 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTomeich Yisroel Inc: $72 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRefuah Helpline Incdba Refuah Resources: $54 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShuvu Return Inc: $43 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYeshivas Ohr V'Daas: $35 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMisaskim Corp: $30 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBikur Cholim Inc: $30 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMifal Mayunes Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMikvah USA Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChai Lifeline Inc: $25 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMasbia: $25 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArachim America Inc: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAgudas Tov V'Chesed Inc: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLev Leyeled Inc: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva Derech Chaim: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY42.5× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Ani Mamin Foundation · The Gds Foundation · Mezritch Foundation · Mtw Services Inc · Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Dove Holdings · Rachels Foundation · Jeffrey Charitable Foundation · The Light of Chaim Foundation · Ohel Naftoly

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Pillars Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Pillars Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Pillars Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Pillars Trust

How much does The Pillars Trust give?
The Pillars Trust reported 50 grants totaling $104,027 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 124 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Pillars Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (33%), Philanthropy (27%), Community Improvement (14%).
Who are The Pillars Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Shekel Hakodesh ($13k), Yad Ltalmid Inc ($8k), Congregation of New Square ($8k).
Does The Pillars Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 24% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Pillars Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Pillars Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Ojc Fund, Ani Mamin Foundation, The Gds Foundation.
Where is The Pillars Trust based?
The Pillars Trust is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 155 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pillars’ filings →

More from the funding graph