Skip to content

· Public charity

Schoellerman Foundation

To provide support to charitable organizations that support educational & cultural programs; family issues; medical research & healthcare; and catholic organizations

$291k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$315kHuman Services$296kInternational$225kHealth$182kPhilanthropy$80kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kArts & Culture$59kEducation$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $248,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $291,250 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $43,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $236k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARYKNOLL FATHERS & BROTHERS$33,000
HUMAN OPTIONS$30,500
JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICEUSA$30,000
MARYKNOLL SISTERS$28,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$25,500
USA FOR UNHCR$25,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$23,000
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FDN$16,000
SYLVESTER COMP CANCER CENTER$13,000
GIGIS PLAYHOUSE DEERFIELD BA$12,000
HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$6,000
OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CATH$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UCI HEALTH ADVANCEMENT: $10k → 10%MARYKNOLL SISTERS: $50k → 9%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $34k → 17%USA FOR UNHCR: $30k → 14%SYLVESTER COMP CANCER CENTER: $13k → 15%SIGHTLIFE: $6k → 9%GIGIS PLAYHOUSE DEERFIELD BA: $13k → 8%GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE: $11k → 14%FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $11k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $50k → 9%USA FOR UNHCR: $25k → 14%SYLVESTER COMP CANCER CENTER: $13k → 15%GIGIS PLAYHOUSE DEERFIELD BA: $12k → 8%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $45k → 9%USA FOR UNHCR: $20k → 14%GIGIS PLAYHOUSE DEERFIELD BA: $7k → 8%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%MARYKNOLL SISTERS: $40k → 9%USA FOR UNHCR: $15k → 14%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%MARYKNOLL FATHERS & BROTHERS: $33k → 9%USA FOR UNHCR: $15k → 14%HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%MARYKNOLL SISTERS: $28k → 9%USA FOR UNHCR: $10k → 14%THE WOODEN FLOOR: $10k → 10%MARYKNOLL SISTERS: $23k → 9%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $23k → 14%MARYKNOLL SISTERS: $10k → 9%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $23k → 14%ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $21k → 10%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $20k → 14%OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH: $12k → 10%JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICEUSA: $34k → 14%ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICEUSA: $30k → 14%JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICEUSA: $30k → 14%JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICEUSA: $25k → 14%JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICEUSA: $10k → 14%UCI FOUNDATION GAVIN HERBERT EYE INSTITUTE: $40k → 10%UCI FOUNDATION GAVIN HERBERT EYE INSTITUTE: $25k → 10%UCI FOUNDATION GAVIN HERBERT EYE INSTITUTE: $23k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CA-ADVANCEMENT: $23k → 10%DISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FDN: $17k → 10%ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FDN: $16k → 10%ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FDN: $16k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 14 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+45%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Human Options Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $156k · revenue +21%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +39%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $66k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CA-ADVANCEMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
  • DE
    DISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -14%
  • GP
    GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Inc

Habitat for humanity's mission is to give witness to the christian gospel by working with god's people to build decent habitats for those who are inadequately sheltered in orange county.

—
3
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health
7
California Life Sciences Association

Clsa advances californias world-leading life sciences innovation ecosystem by advocating for effective national, state and local public policies and supporting entrepreneurs and life sciences businesses.

Community Improvement
8
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
9
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
11
Sankara Eye Foundation Usa

To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…

Health
12
Ccof Certification Services Llc

Ccof certification services, llc, a wholly owned subsidiary of california certified organic farmers inc., provides a wide array of cost-effective, organic certification programs. ccof certifies farm and livestock operations, processors,…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orange County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Discovery Eye Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARYKNOLL SISTERS: $151,000 · OtherMARYKNOLL SISTERSJESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USA: $129,000 · OtherJESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE USAMARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $128,000 · OtherMARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERSUCI FOUNDATION GAVIN HERBERT EYE INSTITUTE: $87,500 · OtherUCI FOUNDATION GAVIN HERBERT EYE INSTITUTEGIGIS PLAYHOUSE DEERFIELD BA: $31,500 · OtherSYLVESTER COMP CANCER CENTER: $26,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CA-ADVANCEMENT: $22,500 · Other+6 more: $84,750 · Other+6 moreUnited States Association for UNHCR: $115,000 · InternationalUnited States Association …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $110,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES U…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $66,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCHuman Options Inc: $156,000 · Human ServicesHuman Options …ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $79,650 · PhilanthropyFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $10,500 · PhilanthropyHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $16,000 · Arts & CultureSIGHTLIFE: $6,000 · Community ImprovementVAN CORTLANDT PARK ALLIANCE: $5,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$660,250International$291,000Human Services$156,000Philanthropy$90,150Health$25,000Arts & Culture$16,000Community Improvement$6,000Recreation & Sports$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHuman Options Inc: $156,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $115,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $110,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $79,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $66,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIGHTLIFE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAN CORTLANDT PARK ALLIANCE: $5,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Human Options Inc ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SIGHTLIFE ↗
  • Who funds VAN CORTLANDT PARK ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schoellerman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schoellerman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schoellerman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Schoellerman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schoellerman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph