Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schneidmiller Family Foundation Inc Gary T Schneidmiller President

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$626k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$466k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$3.5MEducation$2.4MHealth$1.1MArts & Culture$259kFood & Nutrition$78kHuman Services$55kPublic Benefit$25kInternational$20kOther$0
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
  • $250k+1 grant · $466k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$818k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WSU COUGAR ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$466,000
HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO$60,000
NORTH IDAHO VETERANS ASSISTANCE LEA$50,000
CANOPY VILLAGE$25,000
A FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN$20,000
756 DARK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–26, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CANOPY VILLAGE: $25k → 10%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $10k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.6M · 11 repeat orgs$506k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
16

Total granted

$7.6M
$451k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-17%

Still filing today

45%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +42%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC
    7× · 2017–2026 · $1.2M · revenue +22%
  • CV
    CANOPY VILLAGE INC
    2× · 2025–2026 · $35k · revenue +210%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF POST FALLS IDAHO
    one grant, 2018 · $229k
  • NI
    NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -15%
  • LC
    LAKE CITY PLAYHOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho State University Foundation Inc

The mission of the Foundation is to stimulate voluntary private support from alumni, parents, friends, corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of the University and its students.

Education
2
The Housing Company

To address the concern of an inadequate supply of affordable, decent rental housing within the state of Idaho and other states and other similar areas of need. The Housing Company was created to encourage the development, management and…

Unclassified
3
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
4
Community Foundation of Grand Forks East Grand Forks and Region

To connect people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy
5
North Idaho Community Services Corp Dba Panhandle Affordable Housing Allianc

To develop and preserve housing in Kootenai County that our low-income neighbors and our local workers can afford. We want to provide not just a place to live, but a place to build a future, for all residents living in our county.

Unclassified
6
Idaho Ffa Foundation Inc

To Promote Premier Leadership, Personal Growth and Career Success of Idaho FFA Members and Agricultural Education Students by Providing Strategic Financial Resources for the Idaho FFA Association

Youth Development
7
Framing Our Community Inc

Serves multiple regions by providing integrated programs that create jobs, improve community, forest and watershed conditions, and increase educational conditions, and increase educational opportunities.

Community Improvement
8
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
9
College of Western Idaho Foundation Inc

The Foundation, an Internal Revenue Code ("Code") Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, supports the mission of the College through the development and creation of resources that will improve and (Continued on Schedule O)(Continued…

Philanthropy
10
Catch Inc

Catch, inc (the organization) is organized and operated as a non-profit corporation in the state of idaho and was created in 2010 to realize the vision of ending homelessness by inspiring stable housing, financial independence, and…

Human Services
11
Idaho Health Care Association Inc

The idaho health care association, inc. is a member driven association whose mission is to provide the unified voice for the betterment of the idaho nursing home and assisted living care professionals and the residents they serve.

—
12
The Kissler Family Foundation

To provide funds for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Idaho College Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is On Site for Seniors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WSU COUGAR ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $3,242,000 · OtherWSU COUGAR ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONHOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $1,187,500 · OtherHOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INCWSU COUGAR ATHLETIC FUND: $669,500 · OtherWSU COUGAR ATHLETIC FUNDCITY OF POST FALLS IDAHO: $228,760 · Other+17 more: $239,900 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,279,000 · EducationWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUND…NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationA FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN: $40,000 · InternationalCANOPY VILLAGE INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Public BenefitIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,200 · PhilanthropyFirst Story: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterON SITE FOR SENIORS INC: $5,000 · Health
Other$5,567,660Education$2,379,000International$40,000Human Services$40,000Public Benefit$25,000Philanthropy$5,200Housing & Shelter$5,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,279,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $1,187,500 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetNORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetA FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN: $40,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetWOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPOST FALLS FOOD BANK: $22,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSAVENIC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetIDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFirst Story: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetON SITE FOR SENIORS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds A FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN ↗
  • Who funds CANOPY VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds POST FALLS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SAVENIC INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds First Story ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds ON SITE FOR SENIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds FARMHOUSE FOUNDATION OF KENTUCKY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Avista FoundationWA19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Avista Foundation · Innovia Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · United Way of North Idaho Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schneidmiller Family Foundation Inc Gary T Schneidmiller President funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schneidmiller Family Foundation Inc Gary T Schneidmiller President. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • First Story: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schneidmiller Family Foundation Inc Gary T Schneidmiller President’s filings →

More from the funding graph