Loading…
· Private foundation
Schley Family Foundation - 2000
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$18k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
2
Communities
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Education$27kRecreation & Sports$14kArts & Culture$10kInternational$10kPhilanthropy$5kAnimals$1kHuman Services$1kHealth$250Other$16k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2021
belmont hill
2022
rowing
2023
rescue afghanafghan womenwomen nownow rawnbelmont hillrowing
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$195k
Total assets
Largest grants
- HEAD OF THE CHARLES REGATTA INC$6,000
- BELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC$5,000
- B Gharmal$3,000
- SUMMER SEARCH BOSTON$2,000
- COMMUNITY ROWING INC$2,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 15% of Schley Family Foundation - 2000’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 81% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 71% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Schley Family Foundation - 2000lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.0% directed abroad (not shown)Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$50k · 4 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
11
Total granted
$50k
$30k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+16%
+99%
Still filing today
75%
91%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Recreation & SportsInternationalEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC5× · 2018–2024 · $27k · revenue +78%
- HOHEAD OF THE CHARLES REGATTA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +16%
- SSSUMMER SEARCH BOSTON3× · 2022–2024 · $8k
Funded once
- FMFILM MAKERS COLLABORATIVE INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +38%
- IMINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPSgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +69%
- TATF ANTAL INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +341%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Connecticut Boat Club Inc
The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable,educational and scientific purposes under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code(or corresponding section of any future federal tax code)including, but not limited to support…
Recreation & Sports
2
North Bay Rowing Club
To advance and promote amateur rowing through national and international amateur sports competition.
—
3
Community Boating Inc
To make sailing and water sports accessible to people of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds.
Recreation & Sports
4
Westerville Rowing Club Inc
Provide rowing instruction and competition opportunities for middle and high school men and women, and masters, adult men and women, rowers.
Unclassified
5
Three Rivers Rowing Association
The mission of Three Rivers Rowing Association is to develop and deliver safe, sustainable and inclusive programs and events that promote the benefits of rowing and paddling to a diverse, growing membership.
—
6
Riverside Boat Club of Cambridge
Rowing competition and instruction for various ages and skill levels
Recreation & Sports
7
Norwalk River Rowing Association
To provide educational and technical support in amateur rowing programs for youths and adults in the local and immediately surrounding areas of norwalk, connecticut.
Recreation & Sports
8
Pocock Rowing Club
The corporations mission is to foster an inclusive rowing community support fitness recreation and skill development and provide competitive racing opportunities for rowers of all skill levels.
Recreation & Sports
9
Princeton National Rowing Association
to provide a venue where athletes of all ages, talents and backgrounds have the opportunity to develop their rowing abilities to their highest potential.Core Implementation Principles1) Maintaining and constantly seeking to improve one of…
Recreation & Sports
10
Bare Hill Rowing Association Inc
Provide competitive rowing program for high school students in harvard, acton & boxborough, ma. also provide recreational rowing training for residents in the community.
Recreation & Sports
11
Dallas United Crew Inc
An amateur athletic organization that promotes and supports amateur sports through competition in national rowing regattas as well as participation in other oar & paddle sports.
Youth Development
12
Organization of Adirondack Rowers and
To promote interest in the sport of rowing through competition and provide recreational opportunities to both youth and adults.
Recreation & Sports
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Rowing Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Medical Corps. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
06the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$26,750Other$16,750Recreation & Sports$14,000Arts & Culture$10,000International$10,000Philanthropy$5,000Animals$1,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HEAD OF THE CHARLES REGATTA INC ↗
- Who funds FILM MAKERS COLLABORATIVE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds TF ANTAL INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ROWING INC ↗
- Who funds WESTPORT ANIMAL SHELTER ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds STONINGTON COMMUNITY ROWING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CANAL DOCK BOATHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ROWING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITANS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Boston Foundation IncMA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Schley Family Foundation - 2000 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Samaritans Inc — 31% of income from government
- Canal Dock Boathouse Incorporated — 28% of income from government
- Community Rowing Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TF ANTAL INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.4× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 881099617 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on TF ANTAL INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Schley Family Foundation - 2000?
Find your warmest path to Schley Family Foundation - 2000 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines