Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schlarbaum Family Foundation Gary Schlarbaum Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Social Science$257kEducation$142kReligion$132kArts & Culture$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kYouth Development$5kScience & Tech$5kAnimals$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $128k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION$43,254
MISES INSTITUTE$35,000
THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE$20,000
PURDUE FOUNDATION$20,000
10000 DEGREAS$10,000
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEMENT$5,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$1,500
CS LEWIS SOCIETY$1,000
CALVARY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000
MORTON PLANT MEASE HCF$500
THE SALVATION ARMY$500
THE DYSAUTONOMIA PROJECT$250
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $100 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
IA
IN
PA
CA
UT
MD
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$553k · 15 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$553k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+52%

Still filing today

40%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthPublic BenefitAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LV
    LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $171k · revenue +7%
  • 1D
    10000 DEGREES
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +19%
  • PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • CF
    Church Farm School
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -46%
  • BH
    BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE SF
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SU
    SF UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
2
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
3
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
4
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
5
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
6
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
7
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
8
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institute for Educational Advancement; the most unlike its peers is Dysautonomia Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $171,000 · OtherLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INCCHURCH OF THE ASCENSION INC: $129,154 · OtherCHURCH OF THE ASCENSION INCPURDUE FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherPURDUE FOUNDATIONTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $86,000 · OtherTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE+10 more: $33,000 · Other+10 more10000 DEGREES: $20,000 · EducationChurch Farm School: $10,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEMENT: $6,000 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CulturePAWS CHICAGO: $4,000 · AnimalsDYSAUTONOMIA PROJECT INC: $1,250 · HealthLibertas Network: $1,000 · Public BenefitMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $100 · Human Services
Other$514,154Education$41,500Arts & Culture$20,500Animals$4,000Health$1,250Public Benefit$1,000Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $171,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budget10000 DEGREES: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChurch Farm School: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEMENT: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA PROJECT INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLibertas Network: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLORIDA ORCHESTRA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOE COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Church Farm School ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Libertas Network ↗
  • Who funds THE FLORIDA ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds COE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schlarbaum Family Foundation Gary Schlarbaum Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schlarbaum Family Foundation Gary Schlarbaum Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schlarbaum Family Foundation Gary Schlarbaum Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph