Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schaap Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$193kHealth$152kEducation$137kHuman Services$97kInternational$41kYouth Development$4kAnimals$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MN ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE$25,488
SCHAEFFER ACADEMY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NUENA ESPERANZE$10,000
THE LANDING$8,000
DAYLIGHT CENTER & SCHOOL$8,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$5,000
WORTHINGTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,000
UNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
GUIDE YOUR HEART$4,000
CORNERSTONE CHURCH$3,000
MN ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE$2,500
YOUNG LIFE$2,100
DESTINY YOUTH RANCH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DAYLIGHT CENTER & SCHOOL: $10k → 14%DAYLIGHT CENTER & SCHOOL: $8k → 14%DAYLIGHT CENTER & SCHOOL: $4k → 14%GUIDE YOUR HEART: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
IA
OH
CA
UT
CO
MO
NM
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$632k · 16 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$632k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+40%

Still filing today

63%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $152k · revenue +82%
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    8× · 2018–2025 · $93k · revenue +182%
  • SU
    SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $78k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CV
    CAMP VICTORY MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • IC
    INTERMOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant Christian School

Covenant Christian School (CCS) is committed to the academic, spiritual, physical, and social growth of our children in a Christ-centered environment. Continued on Schedule O Covenant Christian School cultivates a distinctive generation…

Education
2
Victory Christian Academy

Christian education victory christian academy exists to provide a christian education and team with parents to train and equip students to submit to the lordship of jesus christ in thought, word and deed.

—
3
Valor Christian High School in

To educate students in a biblical worldview, to high academic standards, with good character, as preparation to live victorious lives as christian adults.

Education
4
Christian Community School

As a support to evangelical christian families, the mission of christian community school is to provide an academically excellent, biblically integrated education which promotes christ-like character, preparing students to serve god and…

Education
5
Calvary Chapel School Inc

To educate children and to assist Christian families with their Biblical responsibilty to train according to Bible standards. In addition to Bible training, we exist to provide above grade level education offering increased achievement…

Education
6
Victory Christian Academy

The mission of victory christian academy, in partnership with christian parents, is to provide a loving, christ-centered environment of educational excellence so that the students may develop their gifts, knowledge, skills and energies to…

Education
7
Christian Schools Inc

Education - private christian school grades k-12

—
8
Camp Verde United Christian School

We want our students to know Jesus and be loved. UCS nutures each one to grow their faith and excel academically through Christ-centerd, Bible-based instruction.

Education
9
Christ Community School

Christ Community School strives to provide a superior education in a warm, caring atmosphere that will equip students to serve and lead in Christ.

—
10
Summit Classical Christian School

Summit Classical Christian School is a PreK-12 school that exists to cultivate generations of joyful disciples of Christ by partnering with faithful Christian families to educate their children from a Biblical worldview using classical…

Education
11
Northwest Christian School

The school functions as an extension of Christian Home supporting parents who seek to obey the biblical instruction which give them the ultimate responsibility for the education of their children. They offer a curiculum of Christian…

—
12
Covenant Christian School

Covenant Christian School exist to partner with Christian parents in training their children: to provide quality Christ-centered academic education for children, and to actively promote service in the local church, community and nation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Victory Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Daylight Center and School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHAEFFER ACADEMY: $59,500 · OtherSCHAEFFER ACADEMYSHEPHERDS STAFF: $50,000 · OtherSHEPHERDS STAFFTHE LANDING: $35,320 · OtherTHE LANDINGIndividual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREAT COMMISSION UTAH: $14,000 · OtherGREAT COMMISSION UTAHWorthington Christian School Society: $11,000 · OtherCORNERSTONE CHURCH: $9,500 · Other+6 more: $16,000 · Other+6 moreMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $152,317 · HealthMinnesota Teen Challenge I…SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $78,000 · EducationSOUTHEASTERN UNIV…AMES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $16,000 · EducationAMES CHRISTIAN SC…UNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $92,798 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH PROGRA…NUEVA ESPERANZA INC: $40,500 · Food & NutritionDAYLIGHT CENTER AND SCHOOL INC: $21,500 · Human ServicesGUIDE YOUR HEART: $4,000 · Human ServicesEQUIPNET: $10,000 · ReligionCAMP VICTORY MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Religion
Other$227,320Health$152,317Education$101,000Housing & Shelter$92,798Food & Nutrition$40,500Human Services$25,500Religion$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $152,317 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $92,798 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $78,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHAEFFER ACADEMY: $59,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNUEVA ESPERANZA INC: $40,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetDAYLIGHT CENTER AND SCHOOL INC: $21,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetAMES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $16,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetWorthington Christian School Society: $11,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEQUIPNET: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP VICTORY MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESTINY YOUTH RANCH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHAEFFER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds NUEVA ESPERANZA INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYLIGHT CENTER AND SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GREAT COMMISSION UTAH ↗
  • Who funds Worthington Christian School Society ↗
  • Who funds EQUIPNET ↗
  • Who funds CAMP VICTORY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE YOUR HEART ↗
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DESTINY YOUTH RANCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schaap Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schaap Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schaap Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph