Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Scarcelli Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$274k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$631kInternational$347kRecreation & Sports$95kArts & Culture$75kPhilanthropy$20kHuman Services$720
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$35,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARBOR FUND$75,000
KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS$50,000
BEADS OF COURAGE$50,000
MELODIC CARING PROJECT$35,000
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA$35,000
GLOBAL IMPACT$25,000
CHILDREN INCORPORATED$4,160
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $35k → 11%BEADS OF COURAGE INC: $75k → 15%PATTI CAROL MEMORIAL GOLF OUTING: $1k → 6%CHRISTOPHER STRANO: $10k → 10%GLOBAL IMPACT: $25k → 14%ASHLYN STALEY: $720 → 15%HARBOR FUND: $75k → 8%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS: $50k → 8%MELODIC CARING PROJECT: $75k → 11%CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $4k → 7%GLOBAL SOLIDARITY FUND: $300k → 9%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $28k → 11%BEADS OF COURAGE INC: $35k → 15%PATTI CAROL MEMORIAL GOLF OUTING: $650 → 6%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS: $45k → 8%MELODIC CARING PROJECT: $75k → 11%CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $4k → 7%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $11k → 11%BEADS OF COURAGE: $50k → 15%MELODIC CARING PROJECT: $50k → 11%CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $3k → 7%TOMASO MAGGIORE CULINARY ARTS FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%BEADS OF COURAGE: $50k → 15%MELODIC CARING PROJECT: $50k → 11%CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $3k → 7%BEADS OF COURAGE: $25k → 15%MELODIC CARING PROJECT: $35k → 11%CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $3k → 7%MELODIC CARING PROJECT: $26k → 11%CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
PA
UT
VA
AZ
NC
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Scarcelli Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Scarcelli Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$738k · 6 repeat orgs$406k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$738k
$331k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Melodic Caring Project
    6× · 2020–2025 · $311k · revenue +47%
  • NK
    National Kidney Foundation of Arizona
    4× · 2022–2025 · $74k · revenue +3%
  • CI
    CHILDREN INCORPORATED
    6× · 2019–2025 · $22k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • GS
    Global Solidarity Fund
    2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue -83% · 73% of their budget
  • TT
    THE TOMASO MAGGIORE CULINARY ARTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

3
Global Peace Film Festival Inc

Film festival and other cultural and arts activities for educational purposes of encouraging world peace.

Arts & Culture
4
Global for Good Fund Inc

Primary mission is to raise money to contribute to the cystic fibrosis fund, the national multiple sclerosis society and other worthy 501(c)3 organizations.

Human Services
5
Childrens Global Health Fund Inc

Saving lives of vulnerable children and families globally.

Human Services
6
Cedille Chicago Nfp

Cedille Chicago, NFP is devoted to the activity of producing and marketing recordings of classical music by Chicago-area musicians and composers.

Arts & Culture
7
Go Campaign

GO Campaign improves the lives of orphans and vulnerable children throughout the world by supporting impactful grassroots organizations that are changing the lives of children and youth in their communities.

Human Services
8
Global Girls Global Women Inc

A 503C3 Organization design to equip suffering girls and women around the world by helping them gain access to quality healthcare, education and economic empowerment initiatives aimed to foster self-este

Recreation & Sports
9
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
10
Congenital Hyperinsulinism International

Congenital Hyperinsulinism International (CHI) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation dedicated to improving the lives of babies, children, and adults affected by congenital hyperinsulinism (HI). HI is a life-threatening genetic disorder…

Health
11
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health
12
Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Solidarity Fund and the most unlike its peers is The Tomaso Maggiore Culinary Arts Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Melodic Caring Project — $311,200 · HealthMelodic Caring ProjectBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING — $235,000 · HealthBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSINGGlobal Solidarity Fund — $300,000 · InternationalGlobal Solidarity FundGlobal Impact — $25,000 · InternationalGlobal ImpactCHILDREN INCORPORATED — $21,600 · InternationalCHILDREN INCORPORATEDKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETICS — $95,000 · OtherKENNESAW STATE UN…National Kidney Foundation of Arizona — $73,500 · OtherNational Kidney F…Individual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant …+2 more — $2,410 · OtherHarbor Fund — $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TOMASO MAGGIORE CULINARY ARTS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Health$546,200International$346,600Other$180,910Arts & Culture$75,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMelodic Caring Project — $311,200 over 6y, 24% of budgetGlobal Solidarity Fund — $300,000 over 2y, 73% of budgetBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING — $235,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation of Arizona — $73,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetGlobal Impact — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED — $21,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOMASO MAGGIORE CULINARY ARTS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Melodic Caring Project
  • Who funds Global Solidarity Fund
  • Who funds BEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING
  • Who funds Harbor Fund
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation of Arizona
  • Who funds Global Impact
  • Who funds CHILDREN INCORPORATED
  • Who funds THE TOMASO MAGGIORE CULINARY ARTS FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scarcelli Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Scarcelli Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Scarcelli Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph