Skip to content
Scan Health Plan Nevada Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Scan Health Plan Nevada Inc

Keeping seniors healthy and independent

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$100kFood & Nutrition$38k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $57,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $80,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $23,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC$20,000
THE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY$10,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20k → 13%THE GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20k → 13%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEVADA: $10k → 13%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20,000 · Human ServicesGAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADACATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADAHELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20,000 · Human ServicesHELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADALUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEVADA: $17,500 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEVADAUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADATHE JUST ONE PROJECT: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JUST ONE PROJECTJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY: $20,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SE…
Human Services$77,500Philanthropy$40,000Other$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JUST ONE PROJECT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEVADA: $17,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NV Energy Charitable …Three SquareMgm Resorts FoundationWynn Resorts Foundati…United Way of Souther…Nevada Community Foun…The Zions Bancorporat…Bny Mellon Charitable…Enterprise Holdings F…Ufc FoundationVegas Golden Knights …Dignity Health
NV Energy Charitable FoundationNV19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Three Square · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Wynn Resorts Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · The Zions Bancorporation Foundation · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Ufc Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Dignity Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scan Health Plan Nevada Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scan Health Plan Nevada Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Scan Health Plan Nevada Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Scan Health Plan Nevada Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scan Health Plan Nevada’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home