Skip to content

· Private foundation

SBE&S Clients' Consolidated Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$373kHealth$212kCrime & Legal$210kFood & Nutrition$107kHousing & Shelter$40kArts & Culture$20kYouth Development$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $113k
$11,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Georgetown Preparatory School$62,500
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Chordoma Foundation$30,000
Rock and Roll for Children Foundation$15,000
SEEC$11,250
Shephard's Table$11,250
Covenant House$10,000
Gonzaga College High School$10,000
The Father McKenna Center$10,000
Food Rescue US$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Covenant House: $10k → 17%Covenant House: $10k → 17%Rock and Roll for Children Foundation: $15k → 8%Covenant House: $10k → 17%Rock and Roll for Children Foundation: $15k → 8%Covenant House: $5k → 17%Rock and Roll for Children Foundation: $15k → 8%Covenant House: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$881k · 13 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$881k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+31%

Still filing today

54%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEmploymentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHORDOMA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +74%
  • TF
    THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +40%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • GV
    Georgetown Visitation Oartners Program
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • RR
    Rock & Roll Children Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • AR
    American Red Cross
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
2
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
3
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
4
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
5
Covenant House Texas

Covenant house texas shelters, protects, and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, and sexually exploited youth.

Human Services
6
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
7
Covenant House New Jersey Inc

To provide shelter, food, medical and mental health care, legal services, educational and vocational services and an array of housing options, including transitional and permanent housing opportunities, for youth facing homelessness and…

Human Services
8
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
9
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
10
The Children's Home Inc

Provides residential and community services to promote long-term well-being and success for young people and families who experience disruption in their lives.

Human Services
11
Covenant House Michigan

Covenant house michigan is a sanctuary for homeless and at-risk young people, ages 18-24 who have nowhere to go. it is our mission to serve these children with respect and love.covenant house michigan builds bridges to hope for young…

Human Services
12
Citizens Inn Inc

The organization's mission is to prevent and end hunger and homelessness by providing integrated services that promote long-term stability, health, and independence. (see schedule o for full description)

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shepherds Table Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rett Syndrome Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $312,500 · OtherGEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCGeorgetown Visitation Partners Program: $150,000 · OtherGeorgetown Visitation Partners ProgramGeorgetown Visitation Oartners Program: $50,000 · OtherGeorgetown Visitation Oartners ProgramGONZAGA COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherGONZAGA COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+9 more: $97,250 · Other+9 moreCHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $110,000 · HealthCHORDOMA FOU…International Rett Syndrome Foundation: $5,000 · HealthROCK AND ROLL FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesROCK AND …COVENANT HOUSE: $40,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT …THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD RESCUE US INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionSEEC: $37,250 · EmploymentMARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$709,750Health$115,000Human Services$85,000Food & Nutrition$80,000Employment$37,250Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHORDOMA FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetROCK AND ROLL FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEEC: $37,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD RESCUE US INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Shepherds Table Inc: $11,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHORDOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK AND ROLL FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SEEC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD RESCUE US INC ↗
  • Who funds The Shepherds Table Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rett Syndrome Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Hester M Digges Charitable Remainder Unitrust DTD 6 1 73 · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization SBE&S Clients' Consolidated Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from SBE&S Clients' Consolidated Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on SBE&S Clients' Consolidated’s filings →

More from the funding graph