Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sara D and J Kyle Spencer Eleemosynary Trust Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$480kPhilanthropy$234kArts & Culture$105kHuman Services$64kFood & Nutrition$50kHousing & Shelter$47kCivil Rights$36kHealth$25k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $121k
$60,457
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHATAHOOCHEE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUND$60,458
FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$60,457
THE FRONT PORCH$30,457
THE MUSIC RESOURCE CENTER$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%YMCA OF METRO ATLANTA: $25k → 13%COVENANT HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$836k · 9 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$836k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+22%

Still filing today

44%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2023 · $116k · revenue +27%
  • TS
    THE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $47k · revenue +36%
  • FT
    Feeding the Valley Inc
    3× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +251%

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA (1361)
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
2
Berkeley Food Network

The berkeley food network (bfn) works to expand food assistance services to food-insecure berkeley residents. bfn was founded in 2016 to help establish a foundation of good health from which all berkeley residents can pursue opportunity by…

Food & Nutrition
3
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
4
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
5
Vermont Foodbank

To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Brazos Valley Food Bank Inc

Cultivate an environment where our community can grow, contribute and thrive together. a more resilient brazos valley where nutritious food and opportunity are attainable for all.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
9
The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc

The food bank of western massachusetts' mission is to feed our neighbors in need and lead the community to end hunger. the food bank provides food both directly and through its member food pantries, meal sites, shelters and other social…

—
10
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
11
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
12
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Stewart Community Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding the Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY: $338,823 · OtherCOLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITYCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $113,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE FRONT PORCH: $70,457 · OtherTHE FRONT PORCHCHATAHOOCHEE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUND: $60,458 · OtherCHATAHOOCHEE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDFIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $60,457 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONTHE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC: $47,000 · OtherTHE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INCCHARLOTTESVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $36,000 · OtherTHE MUSIC RESOURCE CENTER: $35,000 · Other+2 more: $30,000 · OtherBROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC: $115,788 · EducationBROOKSTONE SCHO…THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY …COVENANT HOUSE: $35,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA (1361): $25,000 · Human ServicesColumbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour: $4,244 · Human ServicesFeeding the Valley Inc: $45,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$791,195Education$140,788Human Services$64,244Food & Nutrition$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC: $115,788 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC: $47,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetFeeding the Valley Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA (1361): $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColumbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour: $4,244 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA (1361) ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Columbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jw & Ethel I Woodruff Foundation IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jw & Ethel I Woodruff Foundation Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sara D and J Kyle Spencer Eleemosynary Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sara D and J Kyle Spencer Eleemosynary Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sara D and J Kyle Spencer Eleemosynary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph