Skip to content

· Private foundation

Saquish Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MArts & Culture$1.1MHousing & Shelter$935kEnvironment$900kEducation$765kYouth Development$685kHealth$640kPhilanthropy$315kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k36 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
$30,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT PLACE$65,000
CROSSROADS FOR KIDS$55,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
THE RED SOX FOUNDATION$40,000
THE WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE$30,000
FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN AND COMMON$30,000
LEND A HAND SOCIETY$30,000
HALE-BARNARD CORPORATION$30,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$30,000
NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM$30,000
PINE STREET INN$30,000
SOUTHCOAST HEALTH SYSTEMS$30,000
BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$30,000
LLOYD CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT$30,000
THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $710k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $45k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $40k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $40k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $30k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $30k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $20k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $20k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $20k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $15k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $40k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $30k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $30k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $30k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $20k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $20k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $20k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $20k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $15k → 16%LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $40k → 16%LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $30k → 16%LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $30k → 16%LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $30k → 16%LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $20k → 16%LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $20k → 16%LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $20k → 16%LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $20k → 16%LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 47 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
2

Total granted

$8.6M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+159%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $415k · revenue +27%
  • TR
    THE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $315k · revenue +34%
  • HM
    HERITAGE MUSEUMS AND GARDENS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $272k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +159%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Managers of Boston Port and Seamen's Aid Society
—
2
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
3
Historic Boston Incorporated
—
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
6
Trustees of the Public Library of the City of Boston

The Boston Public Library provides educational and cultural enrichment free to all by engaging the public through programming and active spaces, restoring and preserving our history, providing access to borrow from our vast collection of…

Education
7
Trustees of the Berkshire Museum

Bringing people together for experiences that spark creativity and innovative thinking by making inspiring educational connections among art, history, and natural science.

Arts & Culture
8
The Trustees of Reservations

Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.

Environment
9
New England Museum Association

New england museum association's mission is to connect a community engaged in learning, collaboration, and action to cultivate a better museum world.

—
10
Greater Boston Council On Alcoholism Inc
Philanthropy
11
New England Museum of Telephony
—
12
Guild of Boston Artists Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Aquarium Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Lend a Hand Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $325,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPROJECT PLACE: $240,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $240,000 · OtherWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $230,000 · OtherROSIE'S PLACE: $230,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF THE RESERVATIONS: $225,000 · OtherCHARLES WERLY MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP (ITHACA COLLEGE): $225,000 · OtherWGBH: $215,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $205,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $205,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherNEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $190,000 · OtherHALE-BARNARD CORPORATION: $190,000 · OtherTHE MCLEAN FUND MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $190,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $190,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN AND COMMON: $190,000 · OtherDUXBURY BAY MARITIME SCHOOL INC: $190,000 · OtherSOUTHCOAST HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $190,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $190,000 · Other+15 more: $1,095,000 · Other+15 moreHERITAGE MUSEUMS AND GARDENS INC: $272,000 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE MUSEU…OLD STURBRIDGE INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureOLD STURBRIDGE…SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL: $190,000 · Arts & CultureSOCIETY FOR TH…MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $190,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF SCIE…BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $190,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHON…+1 more: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $260,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME …LEND A HAND SOCIETY: $225,000 · Human ServicesLEND A HA…PINE STREET INN INC: $225,000 · Human ServicesPINE STRE…LLOYD CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $270,000 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $215,000 · EnvironmentCROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC: $415,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC: $315,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC: $270,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,355,000Arts & Culture$1,122,000Human Services$710,000Environment$485,000Recreation & Sports$415,000Philanthropy$315,000Youth Development$270,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC: $415,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC: $315,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHERITAGE MUSEUMS AND GARDENS INC: $272,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC: $270,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLLOYD CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $270,000 over 9y, 8.4% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $260,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOLD STURBRIDGE INC: $250,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $230,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetLEND A HAND SOCIETY: $225,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $215,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $200,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetHALE-BARNARD CORPORATION: $190,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL: $190,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetDUXBURY BAY MARITIME SCHOOL INC: $190,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $190,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $190,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHCOAST HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $190,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $190,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDuxbury Art Association: $30,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE MUSEUMS AND GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds LLOYD CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD STURBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEND A HAND SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEDFORD WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HALE-BARNARD CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL ↗
  • Who funds DUXBURY BAY MARITIME SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHCOAST HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arbella Insurance FoundationMA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arbella Insurance Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Carney Family Charitable Foundation · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saquish Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saquish Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • New Bedford Women's Center Inc: 84% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Hale-Barnard Corporation: 36% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Old Sturbridge Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Lloyd Center for the Environment Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Society for the Preservation of New Engl: 2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Red Sox Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Crossroads for Kids Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Science: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Saquish Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Saquish Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Saquish’s filings →

More from the funding graph