Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Santiagos Charities

Provides financial support to colorado children (ages 0-18) who are coping with life-altering and health-related conditions, making a positive impact on their lives.

$438k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$438k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Human Services$982kHealth$753kEducation$437kCrime & Legal$185k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$438,242
Median grant
1
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANCHOR CENTER FOR THE BLIND$438,242
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $513k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $250k → 5%THERE WITH CARE: $264k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Child Advocacy Alliance

To support the missions of child advocacy centers in colorado to help children and their families heal from abuse and neglect via training, technical assistance, collaboration and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal
2
Denver Children's Home

Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.

Health
3
Denver Area Youth Services

To promote and provide a continuum of human services to youth and their families.

Human Services
4
Colorado Children's Campaign

The colorado children's campaign relentlessly champions the needs of children. we leverage data, research, and relationships to unapologetically advocate for kids, fighting for a brighter, more equitable future for every child in colorado.…

5
Advocates for Children

To provide, train and coordinate volunteer services to abused and neglected children in the 18th & 23rd Judicial District, Colorado.

Civil Rights
6
Voices for Children Inc

The mission of voices for children casa is to help break the cycle of child abuse and neglect in boulder county through the use of trained casa (court appointed special advocate) volunteers. the casas provide investigation, advocacy,…

Civil Rights
7
The Arc of Colorado

The arc of colorado provides individual and systems change advocacy for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (idd) residing in colorado and their families.

Human Services
8
A Shared Vision Partners in Pediatric Blindness and Visual Imp

A Shared Vision educates, inspires, and empowers families to nurture the development of their young children who are blind or visually impaired. We provide early intervention vision services in families' homes and community settings…

Health
9
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
10
Child Advocates - Denver Casa

Child advocates - denver casa's mission is to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in denver juvenile court through the services of specially selected and trained community volunteers from a variety of…

Civil Rights
11
Denver Police Activities League Inc

The denver police activities league's (pal) mission is to create strong communities by providing under-resourced children with opportunities, exposure, and experiences with the intent of changing young people's lives in a positive way.

Youth Development
12
Sewall Child Development Center

Sewall child development center provides inclusive and joyful learning environments.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Delta Gamma Anchor Center for Blind Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION — $436,854 · EducationHBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOU…SECOND WIND FUND INC — $314,970 · EducationSECOND WIND FUND INCTHERE WITH CARE — $263,635 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CAREA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $249,563 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS CHILD INCDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN — $438,242 · OtherDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CE…REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES — $283,845 · PhilanthropyREALITIES FOR…DENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $184,530 · EmploymentCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM — $184,505 · Crime & Legal
Education$751,824Human Services$513,198Other$438,242Philanthropy$283,845Employment$184,530Crime & Legal$184,505

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN — $438,242 over 1y, 17% of budgetHBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION — $436,854 over 1y, 27% of budgetSECOND WIND FUND INC — $314,970 over 1y, 41% of budgetREALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES — $283,845 over 1y, 25% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE — $263,635 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $249,563 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $184,530 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM — $184,505 over 1y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · The Denver Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Santiagos Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Santiagos Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Santiagos Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph