Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sandee and Jelindo Tiberti Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$234kHealth$171kAnimals$166kReligion$35kCommunity Improvement$20kPhilanthropy$19kYouth Development$15kHuman Services$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BISHOP GORMAN HIGHT SCHOOL$52,908
THE FRATERNITY OF THE DESERT BIGHOR$24,500
WHIN$15,000
MWP ENDOWMENT FUND$5,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF LAS VEGAS$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT$2,500
OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION$2,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,750
TUNNEL OF TOWERS$1,500
TURNING POINT USA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF LAS VEGAS: $5k → 13%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF LAS VEGAS: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MT
WI
NY
NV
PA
CO
AZ
TN
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Sandee and Jelindo Tiberti Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in NV; by stated purpose, 70%.

Sandee and Jelindo Tiberti Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$633k · 15 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$633k
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+9%

Still filing today

47%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $57k · revenue +83%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +59%
  • OV
    OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +64%
  • BG
    BISHIP GORMAN HIGHT SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Nevada Bighorns Foundation
Education
2
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals
3
International Snow Leopard Trust

The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

Animals
4
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
5
Healthy Nevada
Health
6
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
7
Grand Canyon Conservancy

As the official philanthropic and collaborative partner of the grand canyon national park, grand canyon conservancy's mission is to inspire generations of park champions to cherish and support the natural and cultural wonder of the grand…

Environment
8
Unlv Research Foundation

The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the purposes of supporting, promoting, and reporting research activities at the university of nevada, las vegas, as an entity of the board of regents of the nevada system of…

Science & Tech
9
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
Roseman University of Health Sciences

Roseman university of health sciences advances the health and wellness of the communities we serve by educating current and future generations of health professionals, conducting research and providing patient care. we actively pursue…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BISHOP GORMAN HIGHT SCHOOL: $193,458 · OtherBISHOP GORMAN HIGHT SCHOOLJDRF: $163,500 · OtherJDRFIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH: $28,000 · OtherCANDLE LIGHTERS: $25,000 · Other+22 more: $84,425 · Other+22 moreFRATERNITY OF THE DESERT BIGHORN: $82,482 · AnimalsFRATERNITY OF THE DES…WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $56,930 · AnimalsWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION+1 more: $500 · AnimalsUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,800 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF LAS VEGAS INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $5,000 · International
Other$529,383Animals$139,912Education$23,500Youth Development$10,000Health$8,000Human Services$7,500International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRATERNITY OF THE DESERT BIGHORN: $82,482 over 4y, 11% of budgetWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION: $56,930 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF LAS VEGAS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE CONSERVANCY: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRATERNITY OF THE DESERT BIGHORN ↗
  • Who funds WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF LAS VEGAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nevada Community Foundation IncNV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nevada Community Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sandee and Jelindo Tiberti Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sandee and Jelindo Tiberti Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sandee and Jelindo Tiberti Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph