Skip to content
Sandberg Goldberg Bernthal Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Sandberg Goldberg Bernthal Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$9.3MEducation$5.9MFood & Nutrition$5.5MCivil Rights$4.9MArts & Culture$3.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.5MHealth$2.1MHuman Services$1.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $529k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+13 grants · $7.6M
$50,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$291M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$1,900,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC$1,000,000
WE CHARITY$1,000,000
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$600,000
UPSTREAM USA INC$500,000
ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC (ISRAAID)$500,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$500,000
Individual grant recipient$325,000
TEACH FOR ALL INC$250,000
NEW VENTURE FUND DBA THEDREAMUS$250,000
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$250,000
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY$250,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INC$250,000
CONGREGATION BETH JACOB$115,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $40k → 18%KINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $40k → 18%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $40k → 18%KINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $40k → 18%DIGNITY HEALTH CONNECTED LIVING: $40k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $40k → 18%KINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $40k → 18%DIGNITY HEALTH CONNECTED LIVING: $40k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $40k → 18%KINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $40k → 18%DIGNITY HEALTH CONNECTED LIVING: $40k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $40k → 18%KINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $40k → 18%YWCA SILICON VALLEY: $400k → 8%YWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY: $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
WV
VA
KS
TN
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Sandberg Goldberg Bernthal Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Sandberg Goldberg Bernthal Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30M · 41 repeat orgs$6.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
15

Total granted

$30M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+20%

Still filing today

78%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalCivil RightsEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +63%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +45%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH OF ISRAEL
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
  • I
    ISRAAID
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TENNESSEE AND NORTH MISSISSIPPI
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kaiser Foundation for the Advancement of Integrated Health Care

Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…

Health
2
California Planned Parenthood Education Fund Inc

Cppef works to assure that all individuals have the freedom to make reproductive decisions and, in order for people to make healthy decisions, they should have access to comprehensive information and services related to sexuality,…

Health
3
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
4
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
7
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Kfhpw Holdings

Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

—
9
Planned Parenthoodorange and San Bernardino Counties Inc

Planned parenthood orange and san bernardino counties provides an exceptional health care experience for every patient, protects and promotes the fundamental right of all individuals to make their own personal health decisions, and…

Health
10
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
11
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
12
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California Inc

Organized to promote and coordinate the provision of education, counseling and clinical services and to support or oppose administrative action, regulations and legislation in the field of family planning and comprehensive sexual and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/51
Grantees still filing
39/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC (ISRAAID): $2,000,000 · OtherISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASS…NEW VENTURE FUND DBA THEDREAMUS: $1,250,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND DBA THEDREAMUSFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH OF ISRAEL: $1,000,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH OF ISRA…Individual grant recipient: $825,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKARA: $500,000 · OtherISRAAID: $500,000 · OtherMARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $500,000 · OtherUpstream USA Inc: $500,000 · OtherPROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH: $500,000 · Other+32 more: $3,433,875 · Other+32 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $6,500,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Comm…WE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC: $1,000,000 · InternationalWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORA…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $500,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANC…+1 more: $50,000 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,500,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,900,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH…PACER CENTER INC: $550,000 · Civil RightsPACER CENTER IN…+1 more: $10,000 · Civil RightsSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $3,800,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST …Foodlink for Tulare County Inc: $200,000 · Food & NutritionYOLO FOOD BANK: $200,000 · Food & NutritionYuba Sutter Gleaners Food Bank Inc: $200,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR PEOPLE INC: $200,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $310,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 moreTEACH FOR ALL INC: $2,250,000 · EducationTEACH FOR …KIPP FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · EducationKIPP FOUND…+2 more: $200,000 · Education+2 moreFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $3,000,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS O…+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureYWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY: $500,000 · Human ServicesKINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $200,000 · Human ServicesDIGNITY HEALTH CONNECTED LIVING: $120,000 · Human Services
Other$11,008,875International$8,050,000Civil Rights$4,960,000Food & Nutrition$4,910,000Education$3,450,000Arts & Culture$3,010,000Human Services$1,020,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $6,500,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $3,800,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $3,000,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,500,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTEACH FOR ALL INC: $2,250,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,900,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetPACER CENTER INC: $550,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetUpstream USA Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKARA: $500,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetYWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY: $500,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetPROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH: $500,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $250,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $250,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoodlink for Tulare County Inc: $200,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK: $200,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMendocino Food and Nutrition Inc: $200,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetKINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC: $200,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Action Agency of Butte County Inc: $200,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetYuba Sutter Gleaners Food Bank Inc: $200,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetFOOD FOR PEOPLE INC: $200,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MERCED COUNTY FOOD BANK: $160,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK: $160,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANKS: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH CONNECTED LIVING: $120,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGBOWEE PEACE FOUNDATION AFRICA-USA: $100,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetThe ONE Campaign: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGIRL EFFECT INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMERCY FOUNDATION NORTH: $80,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $75,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTOOLS & TIARAS INC: $70,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHARTORG: $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAVY LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES: $28,875 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Foundation…Calfoods LogisticsCalifornia Associatio…The PG&E Corporation …Silicon Valley Commun…Delta Dental Communit…The David and Lucile …Jewish Community Fede…The Albertsons Compan…Feeding AmericaCentral California Fo…Farmlink Project
California Foundation for Stronger CommunitiesCA29.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Calfoods Logistics · California Association of Food Banks · The PG&E Corporation Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Feeding America · Central California Food Bank · Farmlink Project

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sandberg Goldberg Bernthal Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sandberg Goldberg Bernthal Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Upstream Usa Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sandberg Goldberg Bernthal Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sandberg Goldberg Bernthal Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sandberg Goldberg Bernthal Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home