Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

San Antonio Symphony League

Preserve, advance and cultivate classical music by supporting and promoting live performances, providing financial assistance and service, and supporting and creating educational efforts/programs of nonprofit classical music organizations in bexar county, texas.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$950k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$245k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALAMO CITY PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION$50,000
AGARITA CHAMBER PLAYERS$10,000
CHILDRENS CHORUS OF SAN ANTONIO$10,000
OLMOS ENSEMBLE$8,000
SAN ANTONIO MASTER SINGERS$7,500
YOUTH ORCHESTRA OF SAN ANTONIO$7,500
CAMERATA SAN ANTONIO$7,500
MUSICAL BRIDGES$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AGARITA CHAMBER PLAYERS: $15k → 16%AGARITA CHAMBER PLAYERS: $10k → 16%MUSICAL BRIDGES: $5k → 16%SAN ANTONIO SYMPHONY: $200k → 16%SAN ANTONIO SYMPHONY: $165k → 16%SAN ANTONIO SYMPHONY: $115k → 16%CHILDRENS CHORUS OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%SAN ANTONIO CHAMBER CHOIR: $10k → 16%CHILDRENS CHORUS OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%YOUTH ORCHESTRA OF SAN ANTONIO: $8k → 16%SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $104k → 16%SAN ANTONIO PHILHARMONIC: $126k → 16%FIRST FINE ARTS FBCSA: $10k → 16%SAN ANTONIO PHILHARMONIC: $82k → 16%ALAMO CITY PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION: $50k → 16%CAMERATA SAN ANTONIO: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$748k · 5 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$748k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+104%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO PHILHARMONIC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $208k · revenue +132%
  • CC
    CHILDRENS CHORUS OF SAN ANTONIO
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +85%
  • OE
    Olmos Ensemble
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • SA
    San Antonio Chamber Music Societygraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +104%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chamber Choir of San Antonio

Professional Choir

Arts & Culture
2
San Bernardino Valley Concert Association
3
San Jose Chamber Music Society

To present chamber music concerts in San Jose performed by top ensembles from the Bay Area, across America, and around the world. To enrich our audience experience through post-concert Q&As, program notes, and meet-the-composer…

4
Classical Music Institute Cmi

CMI's mission is to cultivate classical music education and performance as a gateway to the arts.

5
Harmonia Stellarum Houston

Harmonia Stellarum is an ensemble of professional vocalists and instrumentalists specialized in historically informed performance practice who seek to inspire, entertain, and enlighten audiences with meaningful, historically informed…

Arts & Culture
6
North East Texas Symphony Assc

A symphony orchestra for community

7
The Laredo Philharmonic

Primary exempt purpose is to provide the highest musical performances to engage, enrich and entertain the community with a special emphasis for children and students.

Arts & Culture
8
San Antonio Choral Society Inc

Public performance of choral music.

9
Mozart Festival Texas

Education and arts

Arts & Culture
10
Operativo Houston

Providing paid opportunities for Houston based singers.

Arts & Culture
11
Symphonic Music for San Antonio

The corporation is organized and operated for the promotion of musical and educational activities and the organization, management, maintenance, operation and control of a symphony orchestra and of allied or kindred activities, so as to…

12
San Antonio Symphony League

Preserve, advance and cultivate classical music by supporting and promoting live performances, providing financial assistance and service, and supporting and creating educational efforts/programs of nonprofit classical music organizations…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Orchestras of San Antonio and the most unlike its peers is Alamo City Performing Arts Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO — $479,750 · OtherSYMPHONY SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO+3 more — $27,500 · Other+3 moreSAN ANTONIO PHILHARMONIC — $208,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO PHILHARMONICALAMO CITY PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureALAMO CITY PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATIONAGARITA CHAMBER PLAYERS — $25,000 · Arts & CultureAGARITA CHAMBER PLAYERSCHILDRENS CHORUS OF SAN ANTONIO — $20,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDRENS CHORUS OF SAN ANTONIOOlmos Ensemble — $15,050 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION — $104,300 · PhilanthropySAN ANTONIO …
Other$507,250Arts & Culture$338,050Philanthropy$104,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSYMPHONY SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO — $479,750 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PHILHARMONIC — $208,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION — $104,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGARITA CHAMBER PLAYERS — $25,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCHILDRENS CHORUS OF SAN ANTONIO — $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetOlmos Ensemble — $15,050 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetSan Antonio Chamber Music Society — $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetYOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MASTERSINGERS — $7,500 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetCAMERATA SAN ANTONIO — $7,500 over 1y, 6.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Russell Hill Rogers Fund for the Arts · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Louis J & Millie Matcek Kocurek Charitable · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Antonio Symphony League funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to San Antonio Symphony League?

    Find your warmest path to San Antonio Symphony League through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph