Skip to content

· Public charity

San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc

The san antonio livestock exposition education fund, inc.

$3.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$31MAnimals$685kFood & Nutrition$430kEnvironment$207kYouth Development$70kHealth$17kPhilanthropy$15k
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $673k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
$25,375
Median grant
4
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY$1,005,549
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM$362,484
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION$323,219
TEXAS A & M FOUNDATION$300,000
WEST TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY$194,413
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY$173,424
ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY$138,041
SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY$129,700
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$114,042
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY KINGSVILLE$84,425
SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERSITY$64,500
PRAIRIE VIEW A & M UNIVERSITY$63,187
TEXAS AGRILIFE EXTENSION SERVICE$61,300
BLINN COLLEGE$49,334
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$49,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WEST TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY: $194k → 9%TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $114k → 10%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $197k → 13%ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $181k → 13%SAM HOUSTON UNIVERSITY: $197k → 20%West Texas A & M University: $182k → 9%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $192k → 13%ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $156k → 13%SAM HOUSTON UNIVERSITY: $193k → 20%West Texas A & M University: $171k → 9%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $185k → 13%Angelo State University: $155k → 13%SAM HOUSTON UNIVERSITY: $186k → 20%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $150k → 9%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $182k → 13%ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $150k → 13%Sam Houston State University: $184k → 20%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $149k → 9%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $176k → 13%ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $139k → 13%SAM HOUSTON UNIVERSITY: $176k → 20%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $142k → 9%Tarleton State University: $193k → 13%ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $138k → 13%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $171k → 20%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $140k → 9%Tarleton State University: $174k → 13%ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $122k → 13%Sam Houston State University: $159k → 20%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $120k → 9%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $173k → 13%Angelo State University: $119k → 13%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $130k → 20%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 22%Texas A & M University: $1.0M → 22%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 22%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 22%TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 22%ST MARYS UNIVERSITY: $114k → 16%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 22%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $983k → 22%Texas A & M University: $910k → 22%TEXAS A & M FOUNDATION: $300k → 22%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $150k → 22%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $125k → 22%THE FOREVER FOUNDATION FOR TEXAS WILDLIFE: $237k → 16%THE FOREVER FDN FOR TX WILDLI: $237k → 16%THE FOREVER FDN FOR TX WILDLI: $202k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
IL
MI
NY
WY
CA
CO
KY
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32M · 69 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
30

Total granted

$32M
$331k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+41%

Still filing today

41%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.9M · revenue +213%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    7× · 2017–2025 · $925k · revenue +90%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR TX WILDLIFE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $675k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SR
    Sul Ross State University
    one grant, 2024 · $82k
  • BC
    BEXAR COUNTY MASTER GARDENERSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue +68%
  • TU
    THE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SA
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
3
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
4
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
5
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
6
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
9
South Texas College of Law Houston Inc

South texas college of law houston provides a diverse body of students the opportunity to obtain an exceptional legal education, preparing graduates to serve their community and profession with distinction.

Education
10
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
11
University of the Southwest

University of the southwest is a christ-centered educational community dedicated to developing men and women for a lifetime of servant leadership by emphasizing faith, responsibility, and initiative.

Education
12
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Lutheran University; the most unlike its peers is Texas 4-H Youth Development Foundation I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
37/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $8,556,409 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM: $3,976,596 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEMTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $1,875,875 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,471,612 · OtherTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITYSAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,394,665 · OtherWEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $1,247,547 · OtherANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,161,188 · Other+62 more: $7,066,825 · Other+62 moreTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $1,482,819 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUN…Texas A&M Foundation: $925,000 · EducationTexas A&M Found…Trinity University: $376,434 · EducationTrinity Univers…University of the Incarnate Word: $274,528 · EducationUniversity of t…BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $250,972 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSI…THE TSTC FOUNDATION: $228,900 · EducationOUR LADY OF THE LAKE UNIVERSITY OF SAN ANTONIO: $202,500 · EducationALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC: $170,750 · Education+20 more: $611,209 · Education+20 moreFOUNDATION FOR TX WILDLIFE: $674,500 · Animals+1 more: $10,000 · AnimalsTEXAS 4-H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION I: $232,250 · Youth DevelopmentPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $113,500 · EnvironmentSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $60,500 · EnvironmentBEXAR COUNTY MASTER GARDENERS: $33,300 · EnvironmentTom T East Sr and Alice K East and Alice H East and Robert C East Wildlife Fnd: $30,000 · PhilanthropyVICTORIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $14,299 · Philanthropy
Other$26,750,717Education$4,523,112Animals$684,500Youth Development$232,250Environment$207,300Philanthropy$44,299

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $1,875,875 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $1,482,819 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $925,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TX WILDLIFE: $674,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetSt Mary's University: $609,191 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTrinity University: $376,434 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Incarnate Word: $274,528 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $250,972 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS 4-H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION I: $232,250 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $228,900 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetOUR LADY OF THE LAKE UNIVERSITY OF SAN ANTONIO: $202,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC: $170,750 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSchreiner University: $145,776 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Institute of Art: $133,627 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $132,125 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $113,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $98,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $60,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $56,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $47,220 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $37,985 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dallas: $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTom T East Sr and Alice K East and Alice H East and Robert C East Wildlife Fnd: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $26,793 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $25,960 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $23,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $22,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $17,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $16,420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeTourneau University: $15,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVICTORIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $14,299 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $9,582 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $7,890 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $7,566 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $7,539 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCMURRY UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University: $6,278 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TX WILDLIFE ↗
  • Who funds St Mary's University ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds University of the Incarnate Word ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS 4-H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION I ↗
  • Who funds THE TSTC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF THE LAKE UNIVERSITY OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds ALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Schreiner University ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Institute of Art ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK60.4× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · Texas Higher Education Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · State Fair of Texas · Richard Wallrath Educational Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo Educational Fund · The Robert A Welch Foundation · The Callaway Foundation · Glaser Family Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph