How much did SAMUEL P PARDOE FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

Environment$7.5MPhilanthropy$1.4MHealth$73kCivil Rights$70kHuman Services$67kEducation$40kAnimals$11kCommunity Improvement$5kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$846k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

vinalhaven

2020

vinalhaventhomaslakes

2021

vinalhavenlakesconservation

2022

vinalhavenlakesconservationcatholic

2023

solarcapitallakesconservationcatholic

2024

lakescatholicconservation

2025

lakesconservationcatholic

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k4 grants · $23k
$10k–50k10 grants · $125k
$50k–250k2 grants · $258k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$13M

Total assets

Largest grants

PRESCOTT CONSERVANCY INC$150,000
PRESCOTT CONSERVANCY INC$107,500
LAKE WINNIPESAUKEE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION$25,000
NEW BEGINNINGS WITHOUT VIOLENCE & ABUSE$15,000
LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$12,500
LAKES REGION COMMUNITY SERVICES$12,500
LAKES REGION CONSERVATION TRUST$10,000
GRANITE UNITED WAY$10,000
WAYPOINT$10,000
BELKNAP COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT$10,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES (DBA CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE)$10,000
AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE$10,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS$7,500
NEW HAMPSHIRE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE$5,000
SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 8%. 47% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$10.0M · 31 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$10.0M

$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%

+60%

Still filing today

71%

53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PC
PRESCOTT CONSERVANCY INC
8× · 2018–2025 · $7.4M · revenue +9% · 75% of their budget
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND
2× · 2022–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +179%
GU
GRANITE UNITED WAY
5× · 2020–2025 · $140k · revenue +40%

Funded once

HH
HOSPITALITY HOUSE
one grant, 2019 · $10k
MS
MATTOLE SALMON GROUP
one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -14%
NF
NORTHSIDE FAMILY YMCA
one grant, 2020 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Piscataquog Land Conservancy

PLC is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern NH.

—

Islesboro Islands Trust

Islesboro Island Trust is a nonprofit land trust serving the community of Islesboro in Maine's Penobscot Bay. Founded in 1985, the mission is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all…

Philanthropy

Kennebunkport Conservation Trust

The Trust is dedicated to preserving land for use by current and future generations, and to managing properties in a way that reflects the natural and cultural heritage of Kennebunkport.

Environment

Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment

Midcoast Conservancy

Protection of vital lands and waters.

Environment

Whatcom Land Trust

Protecting the rich and vibrant lands for a healthy, thriving Whatcom County for generations to come.

Environment

Coastal Mountains Land Trust

Coastal Mountains Land Trust permanently conserves land and connects people with nature in the Western Penobscot Bay region.

Environment

Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust

To permanently conserve and steward natural resources across our island and mainland communities for the benefit of current and future generations.

—

NatureServe

NatureServe is the global leader in data, science and technology to conserve biodiversity.

Environment

Massachusetts Land Conservation Trust

Conservation and preservation of land.

Environment

Loon Echo Land Trust Inc

Loon Echo Land Trust protects land in the northern Sebago Lake region to conserve its natural resources and character for future generations.

Environment

Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

Land conservation in nantucket, massachusetts

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society for the Protection of New and the most unlike its peers is Science Museum of Virginia Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 79% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/33

the rest of the field

639/8,707

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/32

Grantees still filing

26/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Environment$7,525,265Philanthropy$1,437,891Other$866,616Health$72,500Civil Rights$70,000Human Services$66,679Education$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH28.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Bank of New Hampshire · Adelard and Valeda Roy Foundation · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Ge Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SAMUEL P PARDOE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PRESCOTT CONSERVANCY INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~9 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 043387252 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PRESCOTT CONSERVANCY INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 75% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Samuel P Pardoe Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Samuel P Pardoe Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SAMUEL P PARDOE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Samuel P Pardoe Foundation?

More from the funding graph

SAMUEL P PARDOE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Samuel P Pardoe Foundation?

More from the funding graph