· Private foundation
Sammy H and Jacqueline Kouri Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KE AVIATION LLC | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WAWichita Art Museum Inc4× · 2017–2022 · $5k · revenue +69%
- MTMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA4× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +89%
- NONASR ORTHODOX FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2023 · $3k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $2k
- LLLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The wichita foundation invests in people and ideas to spark change, and envisions a place where all wichitans thrive and belong. as community conveners, the foundation leads with courage, grows equitable relationships, ignites philanthropy…
The misson of the aclu foundation of kansas is to protect and defend the constitutional rights and civil liberties of every individual in kansas regardless of creed, race, religion or other labeling through education, advocacy, and…
To reduce the impact of cancer on wyoming residents diagnosed with cancer by providing non-medical, charitable financial assistance and by providing free education and screening opportunities to residents not diagnosed with cancer.
To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.
To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…
Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
To promote health in the manhattan, kansas community and the surrounding areas in a manner not inconsistent with the mission of via christi hospital of manhattan, kansas bydeveloping and maintaining initiatives in private fundraising,…
To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The wichita state university foundation, as the private fund raising organization of the university, seeks to advance the mission of the university by identifying, cultivating and soliciting private support from individuals, corporations…
The research foundation invests in health-centered programs and partnerships that benefit health care students and professionals, patients, and people in the kansas city community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Nasr Orthodox Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds MARK ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSIC THEATRE WICHITA ↗
- Who funds NASR ORTHODOX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds WICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KANSAS GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Cars for Charities Co ↗
- Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds FOR THE TROOPS ↗
- Who funds Citizens United Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Laham Family Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Zack and Leilah Farha Charitable Foundation Inc · The Todd S Farha Foundation · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Ima Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sammy H and Jacqueline Kouri Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sammy H and Jacqueline Kouri Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sammy H and Jacqueline Kouri Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.