Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Samad Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$630kEducation$282kReligion$59kHealth$35kHuman Services$8kPhilanthropy$7kFood & Nutrition$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIHRAAB FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AFGHAN ASSOCIATION OF PUGET SOUND$5,000
FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC$5,000
MUSLIM AID USA$5,000
ABUBAKR ISLAMIC CENTER$4,000
UMAR AL FAROOQ MOSQUE$3,000
AL HUDA ISLAMIC CNTER -KENT$2,000
OUR HOPE FOUNDATION$1,000
MUSLIM AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION$1,000
HOME INT$1,000
AL KARIM ISLAMIC CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $10k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $60 → 14%HELPING HAND: $8k → 8%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $15 → 26%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
OR
SD
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$921k · 19 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
45

Total granted

$921k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+27%

Still filing today

63%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I
    2× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +361%
  • MA
    MUSLIM AID AMERICA
    2× · 2019–2024 · $8k · revenue +506%
  • HF
    HIDAYA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHILDREN OF ADAM USA
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +14%
  • THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
2
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
5
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
6
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
7
The American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…

International
8
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
9
The Malala Fund

We work to ensure all girls can access and complete 12 years of education. by completing 12 years of quality schooling, girls will have the knowledge, skills and confidence they need to reach their full potential, make their own life…

Education
10
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
11
World Health Foundation
12
Minhaj Welfare Foundation Usa Inc

The foundation is a private organization whose mission is to support the poor and needy in marginalized communities working for their rights, to provide children with access to education, and to provide the poor with access to basic health…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ehsaas Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Muslim Community Organizati…Christian Missionary Organi…Land Conservation Organizat…Community Health CentersNative Hawaiian Community D…Veteran Support ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%6%<5yr13%3%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr14%23%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr23%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr13%29%5–10yr18%8%10–20yr14%61%20–35yr13%0%35–55yr23%1%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,958

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OBAT HELPERS INC — $543,000 · InternationalOBAT HELPERS INC+10 more — $23,703 · InternationalCORDOBA ACADEMY — $280,000 · EducationCORDOBA ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient — $39,000 · OtherIndividual grant …CHILDREN OF ADAM USA — $15,000 · OtherCHILDREN OF ADAM …Individual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant …HOUSE OF MERCY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherHOUSE OF MERCY FO…Individual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant …Individual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant …ONE UMMAH FOUNDATION — $8,000 · OtherMUSLIM AID AMERICA — $8,000 · Other+40 more — $61,425 · Other+40 moreCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I — $25,000 · PhilanthropyHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $4,400 · PhilanthropyMIHRAAB FOUNDATION — $15,000 · ReligionUplift Dawah — $5,000 · ReligionMuslim American Youth Foundation — $1,000 · ReligionTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA — $10,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $7,500 · Human Services+3 more — $230 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 · Health+2 more — $200 · Health
International$566,703Education$280,000Other$171,425Philanthropy$29,400Religion$21,000Human Services$17,730Health$10,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOBAT HELPERS INC — $543,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetCORDOBA ACADEMY — $280,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMIHRAAB FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSLIM AID AMERICA — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $4,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $4,308 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEHSAAS FOUNDATION INC — $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA — $3,093 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMuslim American Youth Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $220 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $155 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $145 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC — $65 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBread For The World Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $45 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC — $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC — $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OBAT HELPERS INC
  • Who funds CORDOBA ACADEMY
  • Who funds CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I
  • Who funds MIHRAAB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA
  • Who funds MUSLIM AID AMERICA
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds Uplift Dawah
  • Who funds HIDAYA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds EHSAAS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA
  • Who funds Muslim American Youth Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Community FoundationCA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Ms Khan Family Foundation Inc · Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Tabbaa Foundation · Darul Sadaqa786 · Tabani Family Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · United Way Worldwide

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Samad Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Samad Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Samad Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph