Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sam & Marille Sparks East Town Osteopathic Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$144k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$314kHealth$78kHousing & Shelter$51kYouth Development$39kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$17kCommunity Improvement$12kReligion$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $81k
$6,110
Median grant
1
States reached
$710k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KCU$20,000
ATSU$20,000
UNTHSC$16,000
Individual grant recipient$12,500
HIDDEN ACRES$12,000
TEXAS RAMP PROJECT$7,500
GOOD SAMARITAN OF GARLAND$7,500
MAGDALEN HOUSE$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,110
BOY SCOUTS TROOP CIRCLE 10$6,000
NEXUS RECOVERY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
EQUEST$5,000
FERGUSON ROAD INITIATIVE$5,000
GOD IS GOOD MINISTRIES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA CAMP GRADY SPRUCE: $5k → 16%YMCA CAMP GRADY SPRUCE: $4k → 16%YMCA CAMP GRADY SPRUCE: $3k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN OF GARLAND: $8k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN OF GARLAND: $8k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN OF GARLAND: $5k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN OF GARLAND: $5k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN OF GARLAND: $4k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN OF GARLAND: $4k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN OF GARLAND: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$405k · 20 repeat orgs$328k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
87

Total granted

$405k
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+59%

Still filing today

40%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TEXAS RAMP PROJECT
    6× · 2019–2024 · $39k · revenue +144%
  • NR
    Nexus Recovery Center Incorporated
    7× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +56%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITANS OF GARLAND INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +233%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ymca of Metropolitan Fort Worth

To put Christian principles into practice through programs, services, and relationships that build healthy mind, body and spirit for all.

Human Services
2
Craig Hospital

Craig Hospital is a 93-bed, long-term acute care and rehabilitation hospital that provides care exclusively for patients with spinal cord and brain injury. The Hospital provides a comprehensive system of inpatient and outpatient medical…

Health
3
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
4
MedHealth

To provide physician services to support the charitable functions and tax exempt purpose of Methodist Hospitals of Dallas (D/B/A Methodist Health System).

Health
5
Ronald McDonald House of Dallas Inc

Our mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. We support the health and well-being of seriously ill or injured children receiving treatment in the…

—
6
Texas Hospital Association Foundation

To provide support, tools and resources necessary to improve patient safety and quality of care and accelerate improvement in health care through collaboration, education, innovation and research.

Health
7
Texas Health Research & Education Institute

Conduct medical research, offer educational programs and undertake development projects that contribute to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease.

Health
8
Seton Family of Doctors

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
9
Texas Hospital Association

The texas hospital association's mission is to provide leadership in advocacy, information and education to enable texas hospitals to deliver superior, cost effective care which enhances the health care of individuals and their communities.

Health
10
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Free Medical Clinic of Oak Ridge

To provide no charge primary care to the low-income and uninsured residents of Anderson, Morgan, and Roane counties of Tennessee and any partnership related to our medical programs.

Health
12
Driscoll Children's Hospital

Devoted to expert care, education, outreach and advocacy.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of Metropolitan Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Good Samaritans of Garland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $52,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $51,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEQUEST: $27,500 · OtherKCU: $20,000 · OtherATSU: $20,000 · Other+101 more: $370,410 · Other+101 moreTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $39,000 · Housing & ShelterRIVER OF LIFE HOMES: $11,500 · Housing & ShelterGOOD SAMARITANS OF GARLAND INC: $34,500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $11,500 · Human ServicesNexus Recovery Center Incorporated: $35,000 · HealthKansas City University: $12,000 · EducationUNTHSC FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationFERGUSON ROAD INITIATIVE: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$576,910Housing & Shelter$50,500Human Services$46,000Health$35,000Education$14,500Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $39,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNexus Recovery Center Incorporated: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITANS OF GARLAND INC: $34,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEQUEST: $27,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MAGDALEN HOUSE: $18,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHIDDEN ACRES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetKansas City University: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFERGUSON ROAD INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUNTHSC FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Nexus Recovery Center Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITANS OF GARLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUEST ↗
  • Who funds THE MAGDALEN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN ACRES INC ↗
  • Who funds Kansas City University ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER OF LIFE HOMES ↗
  • Who funds FERGUSON ROAD INITIATIVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sam & Marille Sparks East Town Osteopathic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sam & Marille Sparks East Town Osteopathic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sam & Marille Sparks East Town Osteopathic Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sam & Marille Sparks East Town Osteopathic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sam & Marille Sparks East Town Osteopathic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph