Skip to content
Saint Francis Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

$8.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$7.4MHealth$3.7MReligion$3.2MHuman Services$2.2MRecreation & Sports$2.0MHousing & Shelter$1.4MInternational$975kCommunity Improvement$953kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 46 grants below total $7,387,406, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,018,835 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $631,429 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $443k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $597k
  • $250k+6 grants · $6.3M
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY$2,500,000
OSU FOUNDATION$1,500,000
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,030,000
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA INC$530,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$450,000
TULSA TOUGH INC$294,276
AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND$165,000
ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TULSA$98,000
BISHOP KELLEY HIGH SCHOOL$86,050
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 11 TULSA COUNTY$84,776
Broken Arrow Public Schools$62,681
TULSA'S FUTURE INC$50,000
THE PARENT CHILD CENTER OF TULSA$50,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF TULSA$30,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American Red Cross Tulsa Area Chapt: $100k → 14%SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES: $12k → 12%Emergency Infant Services: $7k → 14%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $10k → 15%MEDICAL SUPPLIES NETWORK INC: $906k → 15%Emergency Infant Services: $13k → 15%Medical Supplies Network: $71k → 15%Medical Supplies Network: $44k → 15%Emergency Infant Services: $10k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $10k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $10k → 15%American Red Cross Tulsa Area Chapt: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $25k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $25k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $10k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $10k → 15%Family and Children Services: $50k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $30k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MI
IA
IN
OH
PA
MD
DC
OK
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 51 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

51 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
32

Total granted

$20M
$773k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    7× · 2017–2025 · $5.6M · revenue +46%
  • TT
    Tulsa ToughInc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +358% · 83% of their budget
  • AK
    AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • GC
    GREEN COUNTRY TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2023 · $154k
  • OH
    Oklahoma Hospital Association Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • MH
    MARGARET HUDSON PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
2
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

—
3
Tulsa County Medical Society Inc

To be the advocate for both physician and patient, to support quality health care, to be a leader in health care reform, and to sustain a continuing dialogue between the membership and the community in which we live and work.

—
4
Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma

The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)

Health
5
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
6
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
7
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
9
Indian Health Care Resource Center Inc

To empower the american indian through exceptional healthcare.

Health
10
The State Chamber Research Foundation

The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…

Unclassified
11
Tulsa County Medical Society Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to develop, create, and maintain programs in the tulsa area designed for health promotion, health education, and disease prevention and treatment through the professional expertise and engagement of the…

Philanthropy
12
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is Gospel Rescue Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/72
Grantees still filing
45/72
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MERCY HEALTH OKLAHOMA COMMUNITIES: $2,500,000 · OtherMERCY HEALTH OKLAHOMA COMMUNITIESCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF TULSA: $1,596,586 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF TULSAPORTA CAELI HOUSE CORP: $1,250,000 · OtherPORTA CAELI HOUSE CORPAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $1,181,231 · OtherAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INCBISHOP KELLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $616,050 · OtherBISHOP KELLEY HIGH SCHOOLTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $440,928 · OtherIRN Reuse Network: $367,841 · Other+49 more: $2,310,281 · Other+49 moreOklahoma State University Foundation: $5,560,000 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundatio…Tulsa Community College Foundation: $1,055,000 · EducationTulsa Community College FoundationThe University of Tulsa: $648,500 · EducationThe University of Tulsa+3 more: $121,500 · EducationTulsa ToughInc: $1,835,667 · HealthTulsa ToughIncMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $393,000 · HealthMental Health …THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS: $310,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S…American Heart Association Inc: $287,000 · HealthAmerican Heart…+11 more: $271,226 · Health+11 moreROTARY DISTRICT 6110 MEDICAL SUPPLIES NETWORK INC: $1,020,488 · Human ServicesFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $125,489 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $110,000 · Human ServicesLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesEmergency Infant Services Inc: $49,500 · Human Services+6 more: $89,473 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE: $662,500 · Community ImprovementConnors Development Foundation Inc: $325,378 · Community ImprovementTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $319,500 · PhilanthropyBROKEN ARROW PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION I: $62,681 · PhilanthropyLAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC: $20,142 · PhilanthropyTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $92,000 · Housing & ShelterTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterMONTEREAU INC: $7,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$10,262,917Education$7,385,000Health$3,096,893Human Services$1,454,950Community Improvement$987,878Philanthropy$402,323Housing & Shelter$122,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $5,560,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetMERCY HEALTH OKLAHOMA COMMUNITIES: $2,500,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTulsa ToughInc: $1,835,667 over 8y, 83% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $1,181,231 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation: $1,055,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetROTARY DISTRICT 6110 MEDICAL SUPPLIES NETWORK INC: $1,020,488 over 4y, 83% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE: $662,500 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $648,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $440,928 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $393,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetConnors Development Foundation Inc: $325,378 over 3y, 18% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $319,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $287,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER (FKA METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE): $267,450 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $125,489 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $110,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Hospital Association Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMARGARET HUDSON PROGRAM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $92,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOsteopathic Founders Foundation: $90,708 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $90,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $71,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $63,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBROKEN ARROW PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION I: $62,681 over 1y, 33% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $56,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Foundation for Tulsa Schools: $52,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $51,694 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $49,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTulsa SPCA: $44,330 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetINDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $41,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTulsa Regional STEM Alliance Inc: $37,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFood on the Move Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY AND JUSTICE: $32,500 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetRogers State University Foundation: $31,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC: $27,500 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE TRISTESSE GRIEF CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCHRIST FOR HUMANITY INC: $24,995 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC: $20,142 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTENACIOUSLY TEAL INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGREATER MUSKOGEE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $17,050 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTAHLEQUAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH OKLAHOMA COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa ToughInc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 6110 MEDICAL SUPPLIES NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
  • Who funds Connors Development Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER (FKA METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE) ↗
  • Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Hospital Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARGARET HUDSON PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Osteopathic Founders Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds HIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES ↗
  • Who funds BROKEN ARROW PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION I ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Foundation for Tulsa Schools ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa SPCA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…Tulsa Community Found…The Hardesty Family F…The Sharna and Irvin …One Gas Foundation IncSt John Health System…Mervin Bovaird Founda…The Gelvin FoundationGeorge Kaiser Family …Ralph and Frances McG…Arvest FoundationGrace & Franklin Bern…
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK60.1× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · St John Health System Inc · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Arvest Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saint Francis Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saint Francis Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 370%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Rogers State University Foundation: 20% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
37get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Saint Francis Hospital’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home