Skip to content
Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa Inc

We, saint alphonsus health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

$333k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$360kHousing & Shelter$133kYouth Development$82kRecreation & Sports$76kHuman Services$50kCrime & Legal$33kPhilanthropy$28kCommunity Improvement$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $225,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $332,592 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $107,592 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $68k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$678M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEAP CHARITIES INC$100,000
BOISE RESCUE MISSION$50,000
FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION OF IDAH$33,000
SNAKE RIVER STAMPEDE NAMPA HARVES FESTIV$13,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAMPA$11,500
VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT$10,000
CATCH INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CATCH INC: $8k → 8%FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION OF IDAH: $33k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$414k · 7 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$414k
$286k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+27%

Still filing today

86%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $82k · revenue +210%
  • SR
    SNAKE RIVER STAMPEDE CURE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $78k · revenue +74% · 47% of their budget
  • CT
    CALDWELL TREASURE VALLEY RODEO INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $62k · revenue +312%

Funded once

  • GC
    GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue -53%
  • IA
    IDAHO ASSOCIATION OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +38%
  • NC
    NAMPA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valley County Economic Develop Dba West Central Mtn Eco Develo

Economic development for the west central mountain idaho region

Community Improvement
2
That Famous Preston Night Rodeo Inc

We produce a three day rodeo, a three day parade, and bring in a carnival with recreational rides for the same three days, for the benefit of the local county and its citizens. We maintain a city-owned ourdoor livestock-type arena (which…

Recreation & Sports
3
Carson Community Rodeo Inc

Community rodeo

Housing & Shelter
4
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
5
Kuna Stampede Inc

Address the needs of the sport of rodeo in kuna, idaho by providing educational opportunities and serving as a resource to promote and protect our western heritage; enagage in lawful practices to raise funds for, enhance the efficient…

Recreation & Sports
6
Meridian Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promote advancement of economic, industrial, professional, cultural, and civic welfare for the city of meridian, the treasure valley, and the state of idaho.

—
7
Boundary County Historical Society Inc

Museum

Arts & Culture
8
Cache Valley Chamber of Commerce

To create a cooperative community vision by focusing on critical cache valley issues

—
9
Recreational Facilities Assoc for Blaine County Inc

Provide and maintain a recreational facility in blaine county, idaho.

—
10
Mandan Rodeo Days

The mission of mandan rodeo days is to benefit mandan and the surrounding area through the rewarding and hard work of volunteers to produce a high caliber annual event that attracts visitors and entertains audiences with a celebration of…

—
11
Missoula Area Chamber of Commerce

An association providing community leadership and business advocacy sustaining economic vitality.

—
12
Cedar City Music Arts Association

Music & arts performances

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nampa Harvest Festival Association; the most unlike its peers is The Boys & Girls Clubs of Canyon County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $250,000 · InternationalGENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTHLEAP CHARITIES INC: $125,000 · InternationalLEAP CHARITIES INCCALDWELL TREASURE VALLEY RODEO INC: $62,220 · OtherCALDWELL TREASURE VALLEY …BOISE RESCUE MISSION: $50,000 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSIONIDAHO ASSOCIATION OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY: $20,000 · OtherIDAHO ASSOCIATION OF COMM…Idaho Public Television: $15,000 · OtherIdaho Public TelevisionNAMPA HARVEST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $13,000 · OtherNAMPA HARVEST FESTIVAL AS…NAMPA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $10,200 · OtherNAMPA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE…Valley Regional Transit: $10,000 · OtherValley Regional Transit+1 more: $6,000 · OtherTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $82,436 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & …SNAKE RIVER STAMPEDE CURE FOUNDATION INC: $78,310 · HealthSNAKE RIVE…FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION OF IDAHO INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesCATCH INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesCANYON COUNTY FESTIVAL OF TREES INC: $33,450 · PhilanthropyOWYHEE COUNTY RODEO BOARD: $18,000 · Recreation & Sports
International$375,000Other$186,420Youth Development$82,436Health$78,310Human Services$40,500Philanthropy$33,450Recreation & Sports$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $250,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetLEAP CHARITIES INC: $125,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $82,436 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetSNAKE RIVER STAMPEDE CURE FOUNDATION INC: $78,310 over 5y, 47% of budgetCALDWELL TREASURE VALLEY RODEO INC: $62,220 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetCANYON COUNTY FESTIVAL OF TREES INC: $33,450 over 6y, 9.9% of budgetIDAHO ASSOCIATION OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetOWYHEE COUNTY RODEO BOARD: $18,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetNAMPA HARVEST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $13,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNAMPA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $10,200 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Luke's Health Syst…Saint Alphonsus Regio…Blue Cross of Idaho F…Idaho Community Found…Idaho Power Foundatio…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
St Luke's Health System LtdID26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Luke's Health System Ltd · Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home