· Private foundation
Sage Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $259k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN | $55,000 |
| CENTRAL REFORM CONGREGATION | $30,000 |
| JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| NINE PBS | $25,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF ST LOUIS | $25,000 |
| RIVER CITY JOURNALISM FUND | $25,000 |
| ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC | $25,000 |
| ST LOUIS PUBLIC RADIO | $25,000 |
| THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL | $20,000 |
| STARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE | $18,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,000 |
| MICDS | $10,000 |
| SAINT LOUIS ZOO | $10,000 |
| JAZZ ST LOUIS | $10,000 |
| ST LOUIS ART MUSUEM FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MBMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES4× · 2019–2024 · $305k · revenue +37%
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY4× · 2019–2022 · $200k · revenue +44%- TFTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL5× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- MFMEDS & FOOD FOR KIDSone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -4%
- CCOCAone grant, 2020 · $10k
- UAURBAN ARTS MUSICone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.
Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…
The muny is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to enrich lives by producing exceptional musical theatre accessible to all, continuing its remarkable tradition in forest park.
The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…
Support the st. louis science center and its comprehensive array of educational outreach programs to the community in order to increase interest, understanding and enthusiasm for stem (science, technology, engineering and mathematics).
Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…
To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.
The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…
Cinema st. louis engages the st. louis region through educational programs, cultural connectivity, and curated film exhibitions.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Art Museum Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Project Lab St Louis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis ↗
- Who funds RIVER CITY JOURNALISM FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds STARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ARCHCITY DEFENDERS ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds Opera Theatre of Saint Louis ↗
- Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds MEDS & FOOD FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds JAZZ ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LAB ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI CURES EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN ARTS MUSIC ↗
- Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BOGARDUS PLAZA INC ↗
- Who funds FLANCE MANAGEMENT INC D/B/A FLANCE EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Journalism Funding Partners ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS DANCE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds GRAND CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds MENT LTD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · The Kranzberg Family Charitable Foundation · Centene Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · The John and Alison Ferring Family Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Pershing Charitable Trust · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sage Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.