Skip to content

· Private foundation

Safety Systems Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$79kScience & Tech$31kCrime & Legal$16kCivil Rights$13kEducation$10kInternational$4kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$731k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Center for Hlth Environmnt and Just$4,000
Beyond Nuclear$4,000
Nuclear Info Resources Service$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Flyersrights$2,500
American Museum of Tort Law$2,500
Doctors Without Borders$2,000
Childrens Advocacy Institute$2,000
Veterans for Peace$2,000
Western Org of Resources Council$2,000
Public Emp for Environmental Respon$2,000
Beyond Pesticides$2,000
Woodland Community Land Trust$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 38% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%University of Massachusetts Amherst: $10k → 12%Honor the Earth: $2k → 10%Western Org of Resources Council: $2k → 9%Whirlwind Wheelchair: $5k → 10%Children's Advocacy Institute: $2k → 11%INN Solitary Watch: $1k → 14%Doctors Without Borders: $1k → 17%Beyond Pesticides: $2k → 14%Flyersrights: $5k → 9%Veterans for Peace: $2k → 21%American Museum of Tort Law: $3k → 9%Woodland Community Land Trust: $2k → 20%Nuclear Info Resources Service: $4k → 8%Appalachia-Science Pub Interest: $5k → 24%Western Org of Resource Councils: $2k → 9%Whirlwind Wheelchair: $3k → 10%Children's Advocacy Institute: $2k → 11%INN Solitary Watch: $1k → 14%Clean Air Campaign: $1k → 17%Beyond Pesticides: $1k → 14%Flyersrights: $5k → 9%Veterans for Peace: $1k → 21%American Museum of Tort Law: $3k → 9%Woodland Community Land Trust: $2k → 20%Beyond Nuclear: $4k → 8%Appalachia-Science Pub Interest: $5k → 24%Western Org of Resources Council: $2k → 9%Whirlwind Wheelchair: $3k → 10%Childrens Advocacy Institute: $2k → 11%Clean Air Campaign: $1k → 17%Beyond Pesticides: $1k → 14%Flyersrights: $3k → 9%American Museum of Tort Law: $3k → 9%Woodland Community Land Trust: $2k → 20%Nuclear Info Resources Service: $4k → 8%Appalachia Science in the Pub Int: $5k → 24%Western Org of Resources Council: $2k → 9%Nuclear Info Resources Service: $4k → 8%AppalachiaScience Pub Interest: $3k → 24%Western Org of Resources Council: $2k → 9%Beyond Nuclear: $4k → 8%AppalachiaScience Pub Interest: $3k → 24%Beyond Nuclear: $4k → 8%Nuclear Info Resources Service: $4k → 8%Beyond Nuclear: $4k → 8%Beyond Nuclear: $4k → 8%Nuclear Info Resources Service: $4k → 8%Public Emp for Environmental Respon: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$151k · 17 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$151k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-17%

Still filing today

29%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentScience & TechArts & CultureInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BN
    BEYOND NUCLEAR
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +43%
  • AM
    AMERICAN MUSEUM TORT LAW INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $8k · revenue +78%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Massachusetts Amherst
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • AI
    APPALACHIA-SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • CF
    Center for Hlth Environmnt Justice
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beyond Toxics

Beyond Toxics protects and enhances human and environmental health. We use environmental justice engagement and community-based environmental grassroots organizing to ensure environmental protection and health for all communities. We…

Environment
2
Center for Responsible Science
Philanthropy
3
Earthworks

The Corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. Earthworks is dedicated to protecting communities and the environment from the impacts of irresponsible mineral and energy development while seeking…

Public Benefit
4
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
5
Ecopeace Middle East Environmental Ngo Forum

Middle eastern environmental issues: to evaluate and monitor environmental issues in the middle east and provide consulting services for public organizations involved in social and economic development, education and health services.

International
6
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
7
Make Polluters Pay Inc

Educating the public regarding the harms of fossil fuels, supporting the movement to end fossil fuels, and addressing the climate emergency through creative communications.

—
8
Environmental Law Foundation

Environmental Law Foundation's (ELF) mission is to protect the environment, communities, and consumers against harmful toxics and other environmental harms. Our work consistently improves environmental quality for those most at risk by…

Crime & Legal
9
Environment Now
—
10
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
11
The Breakthrough Institute

The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.

Environment
12
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beyond Nuclear; the most unlike its peers is Honor the Earth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Nuclear Info Resources Service: $20,750 · OtherNuclear Info Resources ServiceCenter for Hlth Environmnt and Just: $16,250 · OtherCenter for Hlth Environmnt and JustIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFlyersrights: $12,500 · OtherFlyersrightsUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst: $10,000 · OtherUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOODLAND COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $8,000 · OtherWOODLAND COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTWestern Org of Resources Council: $6,500 · OtherChildren's Advocacy Institute: $6,000 · OtherPublic Emp for Environmental Respon: $5,000 · OtherClean Air Campaign: $5,000 · OtherCenter for Hlth Environmnt Justice: $4,250 · Other+4 more: $7,750 · Other+4 moreBEYOND NUCLEAR: $20,750 · Science & TechBEYOND NUCLEARAPPALACHIA-SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INT: $5,000 · Science & TechAPPALACHIA-SCIEN…AMERICAN MUSEUM TORT LAW INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureBeyond Pesticides: $4,000 · EnvironmentHONOR THE EARTH: $1,500 · EnvironmentTOXICS ACTION CENTER INC: $750 · EnvironmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalVeterans For Peace Inc: $4,000 · Public Benefit
Other$127,500Science & Tech$25,750Arts & Culture$7,500Environment$6,250International$4,000Public Benefit$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEYOND NUCLEAR: $20,750 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN MUSEUM TORT LAW INC: $7,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBeyond Pesticides: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVeterans For Peace Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTOXICS ACTION CENTER INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEYOND NUCLEAR ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MUSEUM TORT LAW INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIA-SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INT ↗
  • Who funds Beyond Pesticides ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Veterans For Peace Inc ↗
  • Who funds HONOR THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds TOXICS ACTION CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Public Safety Research InstituteVA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Public Safety Research Institute · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Safety Systems Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Safety Systems Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Safety Systems Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Safety Systems Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Safety Systems’ filings →

    More from the funding graph