· Private foundation
Sadie and Harry Davis Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $247k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE HARRY E DAVIS PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN'S ORAL | $1,050,000 |
| THE MAINE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST REPORTING | $200,000 |
| SAFEBAE | $25,000 |
| ANDROSCOGGIN LAND TRUST | $25,000 |
| VILES ARBORETUM | $25,000 |
| MAINE EQUAL JUSTICE | $25,000 |
| HEARTY ROOTS | $25,000 |
| LIFEFLIGHT FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MID-MAINE | $20,000 |
| HARDY GIRLS HEALTHY WOMEN | $20,000 |
| MIDCOAST YOUTH CENTER | $15,360 |
| MAINE INSIDE OUT | $15,000 |
| MAINE BOYS TO MEN | $15,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $12,000 |
| WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Foundation for Portland Public Schools2× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +104%- FPFULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +632%
- AFAUGUSTA FOOD BANK2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- MCMaine Community Foundation- Ptrnshp for Children's Oral Healthone grant, 2022 · $950k
- THTHE HARRY E DAVIS PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN'S ORAL HEALTHone grant, 2023 · $650k · revenue +20% · 36% of their budget
- COChildren's Oral Health Network of Maineone grant, 2021 · $400k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A broad multi-disciplinary network that works to ensure we can all live healthy, engaged, and secure lives as we age in our homes and communities. With the voices of people with lived experience, we work on policy issues related to…
Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…
MaineHealth is a voluntary, not-for-profit community and referral system of hospitals, dedicated to providing high quality health care services to all persons who seek care regardless of their sex, race, religion, age, color, sexual…
To recognize the resiliency of people who use drugs and to work in collaboration to create access points for overdose prevention and harm reduction services in Maine.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Maine creates, finds and supports programs that directly improve the health and well being of children statewide; provides affordable home away from home lodging which increases access to medical care for…
To promote and ensure workers' rights
To provide access to outdoor gear and know-how through a collaborative, equity-centered approach.
To build a permanent and powerful progressive movement in Maine. We will promote a healthy, just, equitable democracy through research, engagement, and education of Maine's citizens. We will engage in democracy expansion, voter engagement,…
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
The Maine Children's Trust is a statewide non-profit organization whose mission is to prevent abuse and neglect by organizing a strong unified voice that abuse is preventable and to facilitate collaboration to accomplish this goal.
MaineAEYC promotes high-quality early learning for each and every child, birth through age 8, by connecting practice, policy, and research. We advance a diverse, dynamic early childhood profession and support all who care for, educate, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Oxford Hills Community Gardens. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HARRY E DAVIS PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN'S ORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds MAINE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST REPORTING ↗
- Who funds MaineHealth Services ↗
- Who funds University of New England ↗
- Who funds Maine Equal Justice Partners ↗
- Who funds SafeBae Org Inc ↗
- Who funds ANDROSCOGGIN LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds LifeFlight Foundation ↗
- Who funds Viles Arboretum ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Portland Public Schools ↗
- Who funds HARDY GIRLS HEALTHY WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds FULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mid-Maine ↗
- Who funds My Place Teen Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Robbie Foundation ↗
- Who funds Locker Project ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF AROOSTOOK ↗
- Who funds KIDS FIRST CENTER ↗
- Who funds BANGOR YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CONSUMERS FOR AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDCOAST YOUTH CENTER & skatepark ↗
- Who funds SANDCASTLE CLINICAL & EDUCATIONAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds OXFORD HILLS COMMUNITY GARDENS ↗
- Who funds Hand in Hand Mano en Mano ↗
- Who funds MAINE BOYS TO MEN ↗
- Who funds TREE STREET YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE INSIDE OUT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · John T Gorman Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Onion Foundation · Sam L Cohen Foundation · United Way Inc · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sadie and Harry Davis Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sadie and Harry Davis Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Sadie and Harry Davis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.