Skip to content
Sacramento Association of Realtors Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Sacramento Association of Realtors Charitable Foundation Inc

To support the charitable activities of the sacramento association of realtors, inc., with other real estate professionals to address the housing needs, community-based programs and underserved communities and to carry on other charitable activities associated with these goals as allowed by law.

$98k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$628kHousing & Shelter$276kYouth Development$39kEmployment$31kFood & Nutrition$30kPhilanthropy$20kPublic Benefit$10kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $63,402, the rows itemized in this filing. The $98,402 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$128k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$43,402
SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
STANFORD SETTLEMENT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WIND YOUTH SERVICES: $8k → 12%WIND YOUTH SERVICES: $8k → 12%STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS: $8k → 12%STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS: $7k → 12%STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS: $7k → 12%SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 12%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $18k → 12%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $8k → 12%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $5k → 12%STANFORD SETTLEMENT: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $8k → 12%MERCY PEDALERS: $5k → 12%COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 69% of Sacramento Association of Realtors Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 31%.

Sacramento Association of Realtors Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$914k · 10 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +143% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$914k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+143%
+5%

Still filing today

90%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO
    5× · 2017–2021 · $197k · revenue +143%
  • SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE
    3× · 2018–2021 · $31k · revenue +7%
  • WE
    WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT
    4× · 2017–2021 · $28k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • ASIAN RESOURCES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -27%
  • MH
    MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -48%
  • RR
    Realtors Relief Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sacramento Steps Forward

The Organization's mission is to ensure that individuals and families experiencing homelessness or the risk of homelessness are able to access housing services and resources on their path to economic stability. The Organization is the lead…

Human Services
2
San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation

San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation works to empower and support women who are experiencing housing instability and sexual exploitation or trafficking, by creating survivor-centered spaces, services advocacy and community…

Unclassified
3
Family Promise of Sacramento

To provide temporary shelter and assistance to homeless families, and also to provide rental assistance in an effort to prevent families from becoming homeless. Program goal is to assist the families in their efforts to become…

Education
4
City of Refuge Sacramento

City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…

Human Services
5
Sacramento Cottage Housing Inc

Develop healing communities that are solution-focused, Participant-Driven and Strength-based, where homeless people help themselves - and each other - through their transition from the streets to self-sustainability.

Housing & Shelter
6
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
7
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
8
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
9
Sacramento Neighborhood Housing Services Inc

To improve and restore district-wide neighborhoods for the benefit of the residents.

Housing & Shelter
10
Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc

Hope Solutions provides permanent affordable housing coupled with well-executed support services to people who are homeless or at risk to become homeless in Contra Costa County. Support services are individualized for each person or family…

Housing & Shelter
11
Central City Hospitality House

Hospitality House is a progressive, community-based organization located in San Francisco's Tenderloin, Sixth Street Corridor, and Mid-Market neighborhoods, founded nearly 60 years ago in 1967 by community volunteers during the City's…

—
12
Sacramento Recovery House Inc

Sacramento Recovery House, Inc., is dedicated to providing gender responsive, trauma informed, residential services to adult persons seeking recovery from substance use disorders.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stanford Settlement Inc; the most unlike its peers is Health Communication Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $544,277 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYChildrens Receiving Home of Sacramento: $30,000 · Other+13 more: $70,500 · Other+13 moreREBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO: $196,994 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER SA…MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $31,000 · Human ServicesSAINT JOHN'…STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS dba STANFORD SIERRA YOUTH & FAMILIES: $22,000 · Human ServicesSTANFORD YO…WIND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesWIND YOUTH …COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $13,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY A…STANFORD SETTLEMENT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSTANFORD SE…SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 · Human ServicesSACRAMENTO …MERCY PEDALERS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT: $28,000 · EducationFoster Youth Education Fund: $7,000 · EducationDowntown Streets Inc: $23,000 · EmploymentCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyRIVER CITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$644,777Housing & Shelter$204,494Human Services$107,000Education$35,000Employment$23,000Philanthropy$20,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SACRAMENTO: $196,994 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $31,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetChildrens Receiving Home of Sacramento: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT: $28,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS dba STANFORD SIERRA YOUTH & FAMILIES: $22,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIND YOUTH SERVICES INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL HARM: $13,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSTANFORD SETTLEMENT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRIVER CITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN RESOURCES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRealtors Relief Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFoster Youth Education Fund: $7,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSHELTER PROVIDERS OF SACRAMENTO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY PEDALERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCAMPUS LIFE CONNECTION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEALTH COMMUNICATION RESEARCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTwin Lakes Food Bank: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Greenhouse: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Com…Teichert FoundationKelly FoundationUnited Way California…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sierra Health Foundat…Ed and Betty Manoyan …California Foundation…Pfund Family Foundati…Safe Credit UnionForoulis Private Foun…Sacramento Loaves & F…
Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA35.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Kelly Foundation · United Way California Capital Region · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sierra Health Foundation · Ed and Betty Manoyan Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Pfund Family Foundation · Safe Credit Union · Foroulis Private Foundation · Sacramento Loaves & Fishes

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sacramento Association of Realtors Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sacramento Association of Realtors Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sacramento Association of Realtors Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Sacramento Association of Realtors Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sacramento Association of Realtors’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home