Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sabatini Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$172k
Granted FY2021
20
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Sabatini Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Topeka Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Sabatini Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $172k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’21
10
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Philanthropy$250kEducation$193kReligion$89kArts & Culture$16kHealth$5kYouth Development$4kAnimals$3kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k15 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAYDEN HIGH SCHOOL$75,000
ST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CENTER$25,000
ST MATTHEW CHURCH$14,000
KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT$10,000
LAWRENCE ARTS CENTER$10,000
MULTICULTURAL SCHOLARS PROGRAM$6,000
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
THE VALEO FOUNDATION$5,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF KC IN KANSAS$5,000
BAKER UNIVERSITY$5,000
WASHBURN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION FOUND$2,500
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$2,500
WASHBURN WOMENS ALLIANCE$2,000
TOPEKA ZOO CONSERVATION CENTER$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL REFUGE SOCIETY: $500 → 14%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%ST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CENTER: $25k → 15%ARCHDIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY IN KS: $5k → 16%SALVATION ARMY: $347 → 14%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%LAWRENCE ARTS CENTER: $10k → 15%ARCHDIOCESE OF KC IN KANSAS: $5k → 16%DOWNTOWN TOPEKA INC: $250 → 14%KU ENDOWMENT: $10k → 15%TOPEKA SHAWNEE COUNTY LIBRARY: $30k → 14%KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT: $10k → 15%THE VALEO FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%KU ENDOWMENT: $6k → 15%WASHBURN WOMENS ALLIANCE: $3k → 14%LAWRENCE ARTS CENTER: $5k → 15%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS: $3k → 14%BAKER UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%HAYDEN HIGH SCHOOL: $75k → 14%BAKER UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $3k → 14%MULTICULTURAL SCHOLARS PROGRAM: $6k → 15%HAYDEN HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 14%WASHBURN WOMENS ALLIANCE: $2k → 14%TOPEKA ZOO CONSERVATION CENTER: $2k → 14%EASTER SEALS CAPPER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE TOPEKA ZOO: $500 → 14%MATER DEI PARISH: $1k → 14%ST MATTHEW CHURCH: $24k → 14%ST MATTHEW CHURCH: $14k → 14%CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 250: $3k → 14%CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 250: $910 → 14%WASHBURN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION FOUND: $3k → 14%SHAWNEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $500 → 14%JAYHAWK AREA COUNCIL BSA: $500 → 14%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $500 → 14%KANSAS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%TOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $247k → 14%THE RANCHLAND TRUST OF KANSAS: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$186k · 9 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
22

Total granted

$186k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+5%

Still filing today

33%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HAYDEN HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $100k
  • SM
    ST MATTHEW CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $38k
  • BU
    BAKER UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue -15%

Funded once

  • TS
    TOPEKA SHAWNEE COUNTY LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • SL
    ST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY IN KS
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Land Trust Inc

To protect and preserve lands of natural, ecological, scenic, historic, agricultural, or recreational significance in kansas.

Environment
2
Kansas Bioscience Organization Inc

Biokansas is the unified voice representing the biosciences in kansas. across the human, plant, animal and industrial biosciences, biokansas is focused on enhancing the business and research climate and working with leaders across the…

Education
3
Kansas Association of Conservation Districts

Engage in educational, scientific, and governmental efforts to conserve, develop, and improve the use of land, soil, water, plants, animals, and other natural resources within the state of kansas

Community Improvement
4
Bike Share Kc

Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.

Human Services
5
Kansas Bar Association

The association is dedicated to advancing the professionalism and legal skills of lawyers, promoting the interests of the legal profession, providing services to its members, advocating positions on law-related issues, encouraging public…

—
6
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
—
7
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
8
Kansas Hospital Association

The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.

—
9
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
10
Kansas Cooperative Council

The kansas cooperative council exists to promote, support and advance the interests, business success, and understanding of agricultural, utility, credit and consumer cooperatives and their members through legislation and regulatory…

—
11
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
12
Friends of the Zoo of Kansas City Foundation

The foundation shall further educational and cultural programs relating to zoological activities, establish and maintain zoological facilities, provide for the acquisition and care of species for display and study, and engage in collateral…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Topeka Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Second Chance Animal Refuge Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAYDEN HIGH SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherHAYDEN HIGH SCHOOLST MATTHEW CHURCH: $38,000 · OtherST MATTHEW CHURCHTOPEKA SHAWNEE COUNTY LIBRARY: $30,000 · OtherTOPEKA SHAWNEE COUNTY LIBRARYST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CENTER: $25,000 · OtherST LAWRENCE CATHOLIC CENTERARCHDIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY IN KS: $20,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY IN KSKU ENDOWMENT: $16,000 · OtherKU ENDOWMENTKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT: $10,000 · Other+16 more: $39,312 · Other+16 moreTOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $246,828 · PhilanthropyTOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyLAWRENCE ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureBAKER UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS INC: $2,500 · InternationalSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL REFUGE SOCIETY: $500 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE TOPEKA ZOO INC: $500 · AnimalsRanchland Trust of Kansas Inc: $250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$278,312Philanthropy$251,828Arts & Culture$15,500Education$15,000International$2,500Animals$1,000Food & Nutrition$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $246,828 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetBAKER UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE ARTS CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVALEO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJAYHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC COUNCIL 197: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL REFUGE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE TOPEKA ZOO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKansas State Historical Society Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN TOPEKA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRanchland Trust of Kansas Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAKER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VALEO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds JAYHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC COUNCIL 197 ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL REFUGE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE TOPEKA ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds Kansas State Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN TOPEKA INC ↗
  • Who funds Ranchland Trust of Kansas Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Topeka Community FoundationKS17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Topeka Community Foundation · Blanche Bryden Foundation · Douglas County Community Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sabatini Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sabatini Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sabatini Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph