· Private foundation
S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY | $12,500 |
| FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSIY | $7,000 |
| COLBY COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| KS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| NORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL | $2,000 |
| PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| KANSAS UNIVERSITY | $1,500 |
| STERLING COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| HAYS ACADEMY OF HAIR DESIGN | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| PRATT COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| CLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- FHFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSIY9× · 2017–2025 · $147k
- KSKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $67k
- NTNORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL8× · 2017–2025 · $24k
Funded once
- BUBAKER UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +9%
- SASALINA AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGEone grant, 2023 · $3k
- HCHUTCHINSON COMMUNITY COLLEGEone grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kcu is a community of professionals committed to excellence in the education of highly qualified students in osteopathic medicine, dental medicine and health professions.
Benedict college will be a power for good in society. the college is a full opportunity college with high quality programs of teaching, research, and public service. these programs provide the students and community with knowledge, skills,…
Columbia College improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Central college is a private liberal arts institution dedicated to the four year undergraduate experience.
Oklahoma Christian University Exists to educate, mentor, and inspire students to fulfill their potential and transform their lives through Christian faith, scholarship, and service.
Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.
Non-profit incorporated in nebraska that provides higher education services to adult students.
To provide an exceptional undergraduate liberal arts education.
To provide a culturally diverse student body with an education that achieves a balance among the humanities, the sciences and the professions.
To transform our students by providing the finest liberal arts education available, taught through the academically rigorous, immersive, and flexible block plan.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes.
To provide students with a total educational experience of the highest quality.
How this is measured
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kansas Independent College Association · Jellison Benevolent Society Inc · The Pete Henry Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Rose Spurrier Scholarship Fund · Margaret Nelson Castle College Scholarship Trust · Bill & Julia Thomas Charitable Trust · The Sunderland Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Greater Horizons · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2?
Find your warmest path to S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on S T & Mabel I Nuttycomb Charitable Trust No 2’s filings →